May 20, 2013

Pettipaug Yacht Club Excels in Small Boat Sailing Programs for Young Sailors

A shoreline view of the high school racing teams on the water

A shoreline view of the high school racing teams on the water

The Pettipaug Yacht Club will offer a truly impressive roster of small boat, sailing programs for young people during the soon-to-be-upon-us summer sailing season. The club is located in Essex off River Road, directly on the Connecticut River, making it an ideal small sailing boat location. Among the club’s sailing programs for young sailors this summer are those at the club’s prestigious Pettipaug Sailing Academy.

The guiding spirit behind the Pettipaug Sailing Academy is retired Electric Boat engineer and club Board member, Paul Risseew. Risseew not only directs the Sailing Academy, he runs virtually all of the sailing and boating programs at the Pettipaug Yacht Club.

Learning to Sail at the Pettipaug Sailing Academy

The aim of the Pettipaug Sailing Academy, which was founded in 1950, is to teach young sailors in Risseew’s words, “the pleasure of sailing in small boats and also the racing in small sailboats.”

Six rigged sailboats are ready for the afternoon races

Six rigged sailboats are ready for the afternoon races

155 young sailors have enrolled this coming summer for the sailing classes at the Academy. Courses at the Academy are divided into two sessions. The first session begins on July 1 and ends July 23, and the second session begins on July 25 and ends on August 16. Some students take both sessions for seven full weeks. Others opt for a single session of three and a half weeks.

Rolling sailboats into the water; a stiff winds await them

Rolling sailboats into the water; a stiff winds await them

Academy days are also broken up into morning classes and afternoon classes.  Morning classes, which are for children, ages 8 to 11, are held from nine o’clock until noon. Afternoon classes, which are for students, ages 12 to 16, are held from one o’clock until four o’clock.

Sailboats ready for winds gusting to 20 knots

Sailboats ready for winds gusting to 20 knots

The curriculum of the Pettipaug Sailing Academy includes lessons in teamwork, rigging, capsize recovery, tacking, gibing, reaching, running, sailing to windward and tying knots. Upon their graduation from the Sailing Academy, students are givens ranks that reflect their respective sailing skills. The rank of progressions as they are called are; Seaman, Seaman First Class, Second Mate, First Mate, Boatswain, Skipper, and Racing Skipper.

With the wind blowing hard a sailboat sets sail from the dock

With the wind blowing hard a sailboat sets sail from the dock

This year the enrollment at the Pettipaug Sailing Academy was completely filled by March 30. However, sometimes there are drop outs, just before classes begin. When this happens, new students are taken off the waiting list. The tuition at the Academy for both sessions is $700 and $400 for a single session.

A Sailboat “Race Clinic” to Precede Academy Classes

 Prior to the instructional sailing classes of the Pettipaug Sailing Academy, the club will hold an intensive, five-day “Race Clinic” for small boat, racing sailors. Classes for the clinic will be held from Monday, June 24, to Friday, June 28. The “Race Clinic” is designed to teach students how to win sailboat races, and it is expected to attract some 25 students, ages 12 to 15.

All eight fulltime sailing instructors at the club will serve on the faculty of “Race Clinic.” The clinic’s curriculum will include; in getting a good start in a race, reading the wind to attain the fastest speed, as well as learning what are sometimes not so nice, but permitted, racing tactics. Tuition for the intense, five day “Race Clinic” is $200.

Other Summer Programs at the Pettipaug Yacht Club

Another program featured this summer at the Pettipaug Yacht Club will be Powerboat Courses designed by the U.S. Powerboating Association. There will be eleven, one day, Powerboat Courses held throughout the summer sailing season. The first course will be held on Sunday, April 28, and the other course dates will be posted on the club’s web site at www.pettipaug.com and on the club’s bulletin board.

The Powerboat Courses are for students of all ages, and the one-day course begins at 8:30 a.m. and end at 6:00 p.m. The tuition is $180. For further details contact Paul Risseew at 860-767-1995, or at PRisseew@aol.com .

Teaching Sailors to Teach the Art of Sailing

As if the above programs were not enough, there will also be two courses at the club on teaching sailors how to teach the art of sailing.  A Level 1 Instruction Course for would-be sailing teachers will be held over the two weekends of June 8-9 and June 15-16. A more advanced Level 2 Instruction Course for sailing teachers will be held over three consecutive days, June 17, 18 and 19.  The tuition for the Level 1 course is $350, and $300 for the Level 2 course.

In addition, there will be Windsurfing Courses, mostly for the young, throughout the summer, for which there could be a small charge.

Club’s Hosting of High School Racing Teams

Finally, during the months of March and April of this year, the club has been hosting sailboat races for three local, high school sailing teams. (Photos of a recent race of these teams are pictured with this article.) The teams are students from; Valley Regional High School, which has nine sailors; Xavier High School, which has 16 sailors; and Daniel Hand High School, which as 28 sailors.

Fifteen of the sailboats used in this pre-season sailing program are owned by the Pettipaug Yacht Club, and twelve are owned by Xavier High School. Although it is understood that all of the sailors participating in this program are members of the Pettipaug Yacht Club, there is no financial cost involved for the racing participants.

Paul Risseew’s Philosophy of Teaching Young Sailors to Sail 

 In teaching young sailors Risseew said, “Our priorities at Pettipaug are Safety, Fun and Learning, in that order.” He also noted, “If the students are not having fun, they won’t pay attention to the learning.”

Pettipaug Sailing Academy leader, Paul Risseew

Pettipaug Sailing Academy leader, Paul Risseew

“The majority of students return year after year, because they are spending the warm summer days with friends and playing on, and in, the water,” he continued. “Pettipaug is able to provide expert racing coaching to those who want to go in that direction. We send Optimist and 420 race teams to over a dozen regattas at other clubs in Connecticut.”

Putting it all in perspective, Risseew said, “As Rat said to Mole, in Wind in the Willows:  “‘There is nothing, absolutely nothing, half so much worth doing as simply messing about in boats.” 

Senator Linares Lunches with Seniors, and Discusses His “No” Vote on Gun Control

Senator Linares extends a greeting at lunch for seniors in Old Saybrook

Senator Linares extends a greeting at lunch for seniors in Old Saybrook

State Senator Art Linares joined a well attended lunch on Thursday at the   Estuary Council of Seniors at 200 Main Street in Old Saybrook. The Senator, whose district includes parts of Old Saybrook, and all of Chester, Deep River, Essex, and Westbrook, as well as six other Connecticut towns, did not deliver a formal address at the lunch.

Rather, the 24 year old state legislator sat at a table with an ordinary group of seniors for his lunch, and after a brief greeting to all he circulated around the dining hall shaking hands, and engaging in small talk with diners.  In all there were close to a hundred seniors attending the lunch. The cost per person for an Estuary lunch is $3.00.

Senator Lineras’ “No” Vote on the New Gun Control Law

After the lunch the Senator consented to a discussion of his views on the state’s new gun control law. The law was recently passed by the state legislature and signed into law by the Governor. Senator Linares cast his “no” vote on the gun control bill in the State Senate.

Asked to give his reasons for voting against gun control bill, the Senator said, “The legislation outlaws 100 kinds of guns.” He continued, “Most guns are used for self-defense,” and citizens should have, “the freedom to defend themselves.”

Continuing, he said, the new law by imposing so many restrictions on the ownership of guns “could create a black market” in the sale of guns. He also opined that taking away guns from common citizens could have the effect of being “dangerous to law enforcement officers.” “My concern it the police officers,” he said.

In addition, the Senator stressed that the new, gun law bill was moving so fast through the state legislature, “I did not have a chance to read the bill.”  Summing up his position, the first term Senator said that the state’s new gun control law “went too far and was too extreme.” He also said that he had heard that, “they are confiscating guns” from private citizens, although he gave no specifics.

Representative Giuliano Voted “No” on New Gun Law

In discussing his “no” vote on gun control legislation, the Senator said that a number of other local legislators had voted against the bill. He mentioned, specifically, State Representative Marilyn Giuliano, who voted “no” on the gun control bill in the House of Representatives. Giuliano represents the towns of Lyme, Old Lyme and Old Saybrook, and she is the Assistant Republican Leader of the lower House of the legislature.

Frame Finished at New Shoreline Medical Center in Westbrook; April 2014 Opening Still on Track

IMG_6602

Hoisting the final steel girders for the frame of the Westbrook medical center

In an informal “Topping Off” ceremony last Thursday morning, the steel-girded frame of the new Shoreline Medical Center in Westbrook was declared complete. Or, as one observer put it, “The steel skeleton is now finished.”

Huge crane that put in place the steel girders for the new Westbrook medical center

Huge crane that put in place the steel girders for the new Westbrook medical center

There now remains the task of covering the frame, completely, with new surface materials, as well as constructing the entire interior of the new medical center building.

Workers precariously perched on narrow steel girders at construction site

Workers precariously perched on narrow steel girders at construction sited lab

Also, according to an official of Middlesex Hospital, which is building the new Shoreline Medical Center in Westbrook, the project is still on track to open its doors for new patients in April 2014.

New Westbrook Center Will Be Off Exit 65 of I-95

The new Shoreline Medical Center in Westbrook will be located on Flat Rock Road at Exit 65 off I-95. The new 40,000 square, emergency medical facility will be twice as large as the present Shoreline Medical Center in Essex, which it will replace.

A Middlesex Hospital spokesperson said that there are still no plans as what to do with the Essex Shoreline Medical Center, once the Westbrook center takes its place.  Further dwarfing the size of the present Essex Shoreline center, the new Westbrook Shoreline Medical Center can be expanded from 40,000 square feet to 60,000 square feet, if necessity demands it.

Although Middlesex Hospital’s publicity materials stress that the new Shoreline center in Westbrook is only three miles away from the present Shoreline center  in Essex, in the minds of many Essex residents, it feels like their emergency center is gone forever, regardless of the new improvements in care promised at the new Westbrook facility.

Artist rendering of finished Shoreline Emergency Medical Center in Westbrook

Artist rendering of finished Shoreline Emergency Medical Center in Westbrook

Read related article by Jerome Wilson:

New Emergency Medical Center to Replace Essex’s Medical Center in April 2014

Senate Republican Staff Attorney Prepares Summary of Provisions of New Gun Law

A summary of the provisions of Connecticut’s new “Gun Violence Prevention and Children’s Safety” law has been prepared by Mike Cronin, Esq., a Staff Attorney of the Senate Republicans.  The summary, dated April 5, 2013, is available on the Connecticut Senate Republican’s website.

Using a question and answer format, the summary is a guide as how to obey the new gun control law. Typical questions posed in the summary include:

Do I have to give up any of my presently owned guns? How does the new law affect the sale of assault style rifles? Hand guns? Shot guns? What are the new registration requirements for assault style guns, and what are the new limits on ammunition purchases?

Private Guns Sales Covered by New Law

Also, the summary notes that the new gun control law requires a background check for firearm sales, including private transactions.

Here is one of the twenty-four questions asked and answered in Attorney Cronin’s guide:

Q. If I already own a large capacity magazine, can I still use it?

A. Yes. If you legally possess large capacity magazines prior to the passage of this bill you can still use it in your gun. If you are at home or at a target range or shooting clubs, you can load as many bullets as the magazine can hold. Anywhere else, you can only load 10 bullets in the magazine.

State Senator Art Linares Voted “No” on New “Gun Violence Prevention” Legislation

State Senator Art Linares voted “no” on the recently enacted, new Connecticut state law, entitled, “An Act Concerning Gun Violence Prevention and Children’s Safety.” Connecticut Governor Daniel Malloy signed the bill into law on April 4.

In explaining his “no” vote the Senator said in a written statement, “Having witnessed the emotional accounts of parents, teachers and citizens after the Newtown tragedy, I am more committed than ever to help create a safer Connecticut.”

He continued, “After much consideration and talking with many residents of the 33rd district, I decided to vote no on the bill. While I support some of the individual elements such as criminal background checks and discontinuing the early release program for violent felons, I concluded that [the bill] did not correctly address the most important issues of safe neighborhoods, school security, and most importantly, mental health.”

Following three more paragraphs of explaining the reasons for his “no” vote, the Senator concluded, “Now that [the bill] has passed, I will continue moving forward, working with our school superintendents to address school safety issues, with our mental health experts to get access to needed resources, and with gun owners to help them understand the new regulations.”

Sen. Linares represents the 33rd Senate District, which includes Chester, Clinton, Colchester, Deep River, East Haddam, East Hampton, Essex, Haddam, Lyme, Old Saybrook, Portland, and Westbrook.

New Emergency Medical Center in Westbrook To Replace Essex’s Medical Center in April 2014

Artist rendering of finished Shoreline Emergency Medical Center in Westbrook

Artist rendering of finished Shoreline Emergency Medical Center in Westbrook

A new $28 million Middlesex Hospital Shoreline Medical Center, which is presently under construction in Westbrook, is slated to replace the hospital’s present Shoreline Medical Center in Essex as early as next April. According to Middlesex Hospital’s Harry Evert, Senior Vice President, Strategic Planning and Operations, the new Westbrook Shoreline Medical Center, “will double the number of rooms and bring a higher level of efficiency,” than is currently offered at the present Essex facility.

Billboards Promise New Shoreline Medical Center in Westbrook next year

Billboards Promise New Shoreline Medical Center in Westbrook next year

The hospital’s new Shoreline Medical Center in Westbrook will be located on Flat Rock Place, just off Exit 65 of Interstate I-95. The Center will be just down the road from the Tanger Outlet shopping mall. The frame of the new two story medical center is in the process of construction at the Westbrook location.

Construction workers busy at Flat Rock Place site, near Exit 65 of I-95

Construction workers busy at Flat Rock Place site, near Exit 65 of I-95

Essex’s “Shoreline Clinic” Served Area for 40 Years

The existing Shoreline Medical Center in Essex will be closed down as soon as the new Westbrook center is ready to accept patients. The Essex Shoreline Medical Center has provided emergency medical services to shoreline residents for the past 40 years, according to Middlesex Hospital materials.

What will happen to the Essex shoreline center, once it is phased out, however, has yet to be decided, according to Evert.

Some Essex residents are deeply concerned about closing of the present Shoreline medical center in their town. At the same time they can be look forward to using a new larger and better equipped medical facility, when it comes on line neighboring Westbrook.

Essex Shoreline Center Was First of Its Kind  

According to a Middlesex Hospital sources, the shoreline facility in Essex was, “the first freestanding hospital-based emergency center in the country, and it became a model for other hospitals to follow.” In building a new medical center in Westbrook, the hospital notes, “We are moving three miles down the road from the current facility on Route 153 in Essex to Westbrook.” An advantage of the Westbrook location is that it “will provide easy access from I-95 as well as local roads.”

Middlesex Hospital’s Senior Vice President Evert also pointed out that the new Westbrook facility would be able to serve, more easily, the emergency medical needs of a number of towns along the I-95 corridor. For example, persons living in towns to the west of the new facility on I-95, such as Madison and Clinton, would have direct access to the new Westbrook center.

Also, towns to the east on the I-95 corridor, such as Old Saybrook, Old Lyme and Lyme, could be served by the new Westbrook center as well. The new Westbrook center could also serve the towns of Essex, Deep River and Chester, as well as Haddam and Killingworth without difficulty. In addition, accident victims on I-95 could be treated more easily from the Westbrook center.

Middlesex Hospital’s Evert estimated that the increase in the number of patients at the new Westbrook facility over those at the Essex facility would be in the ten to fifteen percent range. However, when pressed he said that this might be a “low ball” figure, and that he “just wanted to be conservative.”

New Westbrook Center Twice the Size of Essex’s   

The new 40,000 square foot emergency and outpatient facility in Westbrook will be double the size of the present Essex medical center. Furthermore, according to Middlesex Hospital materials, “Should we need even more space we have the option to add a second level, which would increase the Shoreline Medical Center space to 60,000 square feet.”

Until the use of this additional 20,000 square feet becomes necessary, it will remain undeveloped on the second floor of the new medical center building.

A two story frame is in place for the new emergency medical center in Westbrook

A two story frame is in place for the new emergency medical center in Westbrook

The new 40,000 square foot facility, presently being built, on the first floor will have, “an expanded emergency center with an express care area for minor illnesses and injuries.” Also, the new 40,000 square feet facility will allow, “a separate ambulance entrance,” as well as a “covered drop-off area, and improved patient privacy.”

Outpatients at the new Westbrook emergency center will also have their own entrance, and at the center there will be, “a whole host of diagnostic and treatment services.” In addition at the new center, “Radiology services will expand to include a new MRI testing area, and designated women imaging area.” In addition, “Other offerings would include lab services, pre-surgical testing and chronic care management.”

In summary Middlesex Hospital released this summary of services at the new Westbrook emergency center:

  • Emergency: 24/7 care, Helipad, Paramedic service
  • Other Services: Pre-surgical testing, chronic care management programs.
  • Outpatient Diagnostics: X-ray, MRI, CT, Ultrasound, Mammography, Laboratory services

As for the staff at the new Shoreline Medical Center in Westbrook, it will consist of:

  • Physicians, board certified in Emergency Medicine, providing coverage 24/7,
  •  Magnet nurses with a reputation for the highest quality care,
  • Laboratory and radiology clinicians credentialed in their areas of specialty.

Middlesex Hospital summarized by noting that, “Hospital emergency departments are the healthcare safety net for all in the community, any hour, day or night, seven days a week. All patients who come to the facility, regardless of their ability to pay receive care.”

The hospital also noted, “Each year, more than 23,000 people rely on the Shoreline Medical Center for emergency care.”

Helicopter Air Lifts Wounded Gunman from Emergency Clinic in Essex to Hartford Hospital After Gun Incident

A wounded State Trooper is put on board helicopter at emergency medical center in Essex

A wounded gunman is put on board helicopter at emergency medical center in Essex

A “Life Star” helicopter air lifted a wounded gunman at Middlesex Hospital’s Emergency Medical Center in Essex for a trip to Hartford Hospital around four o’clock Monday afternoon.

Reportedly, the gunman engaged in a gun battle with a state trooper after a car chase and car crash on Route 153 near the Westbrook Essex line. A state trooper was also wounded in the gun battle, but not seriously.  In addition, a second gunman was killed in the exchange of gun fire.

Another suspect in the incident was arrested after the crash in Old Saybrook.

After incident State Police troopers gather outside Middlesex Hospital's medical center in Essex

After incident State Police troopers gather outside Middlesex Hospital’s medical center in Essex

Parking Choices Vary at the Saybrook Station, From the Ordinary to the Bizarre

The Old Saybrook railroad station is one of the key transportation hubs in Eastern Connecticut. Last year  65,315 AMTRAK passengers got on and off their trains at the station. As for the Shore Line East trains, they had 225 daily passengers on their trains during weekdays.

At the station, AMTRAK has 40 parking spaces, and Shore Line East has 125 spaces. Parking in both of these designated spaces is free.

Finally, right up next to the new station building, there are two other parking lots. The one on the left charges $5.00 a day to park, and it has a respectable number of paying parking customers. The parking lot on the right is supposed to be limited to those eating at the Pizza Works restaurant next door.

By mid-afternoon this second lot is close to full with parked cars, but there is not a soul in the restaurant. That’s bizarre certainly.

Even more so is the fact, that there is also free parking next to the tomb stones of Upper Cemetery on North Main Street.

200 New Parking Spaces to Be Added at the Old Saybrook Railroad Station

The rear of the lots, where AMTRAK parking is located

The rear of the lots, where AMTRAK parking is located

Old Saybrook First Selectman Carl Fortuna has confirmed in a recent interview that the Connecticut Department of Transportation, working with the Town of Old Saybrook, will soon formally announce a plan to add 200 new parking spaces at the railroad station in Old Saybrook.

The new parking spaces will require the purchase by the state Department of Transportation of 3.6 acres of private property, and negotiations for this purchase are presently underway. The new parking spaces will be situated on a site off  North Main Street, across the street from the Upper Cemetery.  The Upper Cemetery was established in 1750, and it is one of Old Saybrook’s historic landmarks.

Monies to acquire the 200 new parking spaces will come exclusively from the state, said the state’s Project Manager Keith Hall in a recent interview. There will be no federal funds involved in the purchase whatsoever, he emphasized.

Because of the good faith that has been shown in negotiating the sale of the property, Project Manager Hall also said that acquiring the property by eminent domain would not be necessary. Hall emphasized that to date there had been “fruitful discussions” with the property owners involved, and he anticipates that the final sale of the property would be consummated this coming April, if not before.

In discussing the planned acquisition of the new parking spaces, First Selectman Fortuna observed that the present parking situation at the Old Saybrook railroad station was “not ideal.”

The Present Parking Spaces at the Old Saybrook Station

The 200 new parking spaces at the station will add, substantially, to the number of parking spaces presently available at the station. One of the more informal of the existing parking lots at the station is the one that has a single string of parked cars running down North Main Street.

Cars parked beside the cemetery on North Main Street

Cars parked beside the cemetery on North Main Street

This ad hoc parking lot extends from next to the Upper Cemetery all the way down to the railroad tracks. During work days this informal “free” parking area is completely full.

Another significant parking area that also offers free parking is the Shore Line East, Old Saybrook, Commuter Parking lot.  This large lot has 137 parking spaces, with a few designated for handicap parking.

Colorful sign for Shore Line East Commuter Parking

Colorful sign for Shore Line East Commuter Parking

Although the Shore Line East parking lot is not directly beside the railroad station, it is still within easy walking distance of the trains. During work days the Shore Line East parking lot is frequently full.

AMTRAK Passenger Parking

In addition to these parking areas there are designated parking spaces for Amtrak passengers at the Old Saybrook railroad station. These Amtrak spaces are free, and they are indicated by painted yellow lines along their borders.

The Amtrak spaces are located just down from the Route 154 entrance to the railroad station property. This means that they are the furthest distance from where passengers get on and off their trains. Also, there are no designated parking spaces for handicapped Amtrak passengers, as there are in the Shore Line East Commuter Parking area.

Furthermore, the number of free-of-charge Amtrak parking spaces appears to be diminishing at the station.  Quite recently a number of Amtrak parking spaces were re-designated to be for the exclusive use of patients of a dermatologist with offices at the station. In the process Amtrak’s yellow boarders on these spaces have been painted over.

The considerable distance from the remaining Amtrak spaces to the train station can mean that a baggage-laden passenger, traveling on Amtrak, has further to walk to the train than any other passengers parking at the station.

One Hour Parking Spaces at the Station

Finally, there is another parking area that has at least a semblance of free parking. These are the spaces which are designated as offering just one hour of free parking, and no more. This means that if parkers decide to eat at Zhang’s Chinese Restaurant at the station, they better eat their shrimp chow mien with fried rice for lunch within an hour’s time.

However, it has to be said that this one hour limit does not appear to be strictly enforced by the private developer that owns much of the property around the railroad station.

Finally, it should be noted that the Old Saybrook railroad train station is in a unique category from among shoreline stations. This is because it serves both Shore Line East and Amtrak passengers. “It is not like the Guilford station that only serves Shore Line East passengers,” said DOT’s Project Manager Hall, when discussing the importance of the Old Saybrook railroad station. Of course it must also be sadly noted that Amtrak’s luxury train, the Acela, does not a stop at Old Saybrook. Rather, it insultingly barrels through the station at 80 or more miles an hour. Maybe it will stop for us someday.

Parking Fees Could Increase from $5 to $10 a Day

Railroad Parking Area sign

Railroad Parking Area sign

The daily parking fee on the privately owned parking lot, which is closest to the tracks at the Old Saybrook railroad station, could increase in the near future. The present parking fee, which is $5 a day, could rise to $10 a day, according to Sebastian Lobo, the privately employed, parking attendant at the lot.

Lobo said that even with the increase, the cost for parking at Old Saybrook station would be far less than the amount charged at the New Haven railroad station.

However, a parking fee increase at one of the lots at the station would have no effect on the free-of-charge parking lots at the station, including, the Shore Line East Old Saybrook Commuter parking lot and the AMTRAK parking spaces at the station. Nor would it affect the informal, free parking lot that extends along North Main Street from the Upper Cemetery almost all the way down to the tracks.

As for the 200 new parking spaces, which the state Department of Transportation plans to add at Old Saybrook rail station, it remains undecided as to whether there will be a parking fee or not for these spaces.

The Lot Where They Charge a Parking Fee

The parking lot, where there is presently a $5.00 a day parking fee, is located right next to the relatively new, over the tracks terminal at the station. For train passengers, it is clearly the most convenient place to park at the station.

These parking spaces are owned by Saybrook Realty Partners, whose address is 455 Boston Post Rd. in Old Saybrook, according to the collection envelopes put under the windshields of the cars parking there.

Collection envelopes can pile up under windshields

Collection envelopes can pile up under windshields

The border lines around the spaces owned by this group are white in color, and, generally, they are far from full. Obviously, this is because most people parking at the station have found free spaces at other areas of the station.

Empty parking spaces at the pay for parking area

Empty parking spaces at the pay for parking area

The Collection Method of Paying for Parking

For those who pay for their parking at the station, there is a unique system of collecting parking fees. First, parking attendant Lobo in his red car scoots around the lot, placing collection envelopes behind the windshields of the cars that are parked there.

Parking Attendant Lobo puts in place a collection envelope

Parking Attendant Lobo puts in place a collection envelope

These addressed envelopes instruct parkers to do three things: (1) put a $5 per day parking fee in the envelope, (2) place a stamp on the envelope, and (3) mail it.

The formal printed instructions on these envelopes read as follows:

$5.00 Daily Parking fee

Please mail the $5.00 a day parking fee in this envelope. This parking lot is PRIVATE AND NO LONGER FREE. Amtrak travelers may park in the yellow lined designated area or pay the fee to park at will. Parking fees not paid within 14 days will be assessed an additional late fee of $10.00 per day. YOUR LICENSE PLATE HAS BEEN NOTED Violators subject to tow at owner’s expense. For further information email parking@saybrookrealtypartners.com.

Plate Number _______________________________________________

Date _______________________________________________________

Enforcement Signs Threaten a $150 Fine

Signs around this Railroad Parking Area, as it is called, threaten significant consequences if parking fees are not paid. “Violators Will Be Towed” and a “$150 Fine” will be imposed the signs say around the parking lot.

In an effort to obtain further information about this pay for parking organization, who declined an interview, we posed by email the following questions to Saybrook Realty Partners:

1) How many $150 fines have you imposed on persons who park on your spaces at the Old Saybrook railroad station?

2) How many $150 fines have you collected since you inaugurated a payment for parking scheme at the station?

3) How many cars have you towed for non-payment of parking fees?

4) How successful, generally, has been your return envelope payment system?

Statement by Owner of Saybrook Realty Partners

Mr. David M. Adams, owner of Saybrook Realty Partners, which owns and manages Saybrook Junction, provided the following response, “The [Saybrook Realty Partners’ parking] system has been very effective in preserving the integrity of the parking at Saybrook Junction for our 16 tenants. Saybrook Junction is a private business and has an obligation to provide parking for its business tenants and their customers, while also supporting Amtrak and overflow parking for Shoreline East commuters. We continue to make progress to alleviate some of the parking concerns voiced by our tenants as well as commuters.”

A final article on the parking situation at the Old Saybrook railroad station will discuss the parking spaces that are controlled by the award-winning Pizza Works restaurant at the station. The restaurant has 38 reserved parking spaces close to the tracks.

Only If You Are Eating at Pizza Works, Can You Park in the Restaurant’s Parking Lot

Pizza Works restaurant, right next to train entrance

Pizza Works restaurant, right next to train entrance

That’s right, if you want to park at one of the best parking spaces at the Old Saybrook railroad station, one that snuggles right up to the terminal entrance, you are supposed to be eating at the Pizza Works restaurant while you park there. Otherwise, parking is not allowed at one of the 38, green bordered parking spaces, reserved, exclusively, for those who are dining at Pizza Works.

Even handicap parkers must be eating in the restaurant

Even handicap parkers must be eating in the restaurant

 

The general public is not welcome to park in these spaces!

However, to the chagrin of the owner of Pizza Works, this strict no public parking rule is frequently ignored. In fact, more and more, it appears that the parking spaces, which are supposed to be reserved exclusively for Pizza Works customers, have turned into an unsanctioned public parking space at the station.

Green colored borders ignored by parkers

Green colored borders ignored by parkers

Other Parking Spaces at Station Are Well Organized

In contrast to the confused situation of Pizza Works parking, the other parking spaces at the station are well organized. For example, free parking is available, at the Shore Line East Commuter parking lot, as it is at the forty AMTRAK parking spaces at the station.

Also, there is free parking along the Upper Cemetery on North Main Street, and a  $5.00 a day parking system in a large lot at the left of the terminal building. In addition, there is a one hour parking rule in front of the businesses at the station, which seems to be generally accepted.

Pizza Works Parking Rules Widely Ignored

But that is not the case with the 38 green bordered parking spaces next to the Pizza Works restaurant. Here confusion reigns, and there appears to be little that Pizza Works owner Bob Kekayias can do about it.

Unauthorized parkers in Pizza Works spots

Unauthorized parkers in Pizza Works spots

Even though he has posted signs, saying that unless you are actually eating at the restaurant that your car can be towed, and/or subject to a $150 fine, many parkers pay little attention. This makes the restaurant owner both resigned and angry.

Kekayias, who declined to be photographed, says grimly, that persons parking on the spaces reserved for restaurant patrons, “do not have a right to park there under the law.” But then he notes, ruefully, that these days, he “can’t tow,” meaning that he cannot tow away cars that are not suppose to be parking in the restaurant’s parking lot.

Remembering for the Days When He Could Tow

“We used to be able to do so,” he says, “but no more.” “It is frustrating,” he says.  “Perhaps if I asked the police chief in town, I could tow,” he ruminates, but he does not sound very hopeful that he could get permission.

He also says that his restaurant can seat 50 people, and that these customers are entitled to the parking spaces closest to the restaurant.  But to him the situation appears to be pretty hopeless. He says, “I am just co-existing … [with the unauthorized parkers].”

As an example of the seriousness of the problem, he said that once even he could not find a parking spot next to his restaurant, because all of the spots were full. He also makes the point again and again, he pays to rent the parking spaces next to his restaurant.

There appears to be no practical solution as to how Pizza Works can limit its parking spaces, exclusively, to the restaurant’s customers. The yawning empty spaces, throughout much of the day are simply too tempting for non-dining  parkers to make use of.

Of course Kehayias could hire a parking attendant to keep non-restaurant customers from parking in the reserved restaurant parking spots. But, evidently, at this point, it is doubtful that the expense would make it worth it.

Only If You Are Eating at Pizza Works, Can You Park in the Restaurant’s Parking Lot Next Door

Pizza Works restaurant, right next to train entrance

Pizza Works restaurant, right next to train entrance

That’s right, if you want to park at one of the best parking spaces at the Old Saybrook railroad station, one that snuggles right up to the terminal entrance, you are supposed to be eating at the Pizza Works restaurant while you park there. Otherwise, parking is not allowed at one of the 38, green bordered parking spaces, reserved, exclusively, for those who are dining at Pizza Works.

Even handicap parkers must be eating in the restaurant

Even handicap parkers must be eating in the restaurant

The general public is not welcome to park in these spaces!

However, to the chagrin of the owner of Pizza Works, this strict no public parking rule is frequently ignored. In fact, more and more, it appears that the parking spaces, which are supposed to be reserved exclusively for Pizza Works customers, have turned into an unsanctioned public parking space at the station.

Green colored borders ignored by parkers

Green colored borders ignored by parkers

Other Parking Spaces at Station Are Well Organized

In contrast to the confused situation of Pizza Works parking, the other parking spaces at the station are well organized. For example, free parking is available, at the Shore Line East Commuter parking lot, as it is at the forty AMTRAK parking spaces at the station.

Also, there is free parking along the Upper Cemetery on North Main Street, and a  $5.00 a day parking system in a large lot at the left of the terminal building. In addition, there is a one hour parking rule in front of the businesses at the station, which seems to be generally accepted.

Pizza Works Parking Rules Widely Ignored

But that is not the case with the 38 green bordered parking spaces next to the Pizza Works restaurant. Here confusion reigns, and there appears to be little that Pizza Works owner Bob Kekayias can do about it.

Unauthorized parkers in Pizza Works spots

Unauthorized parkers in Pizza Works spots

Even though he has posted signs, saying that unless you are actually eating at the restaurant that your car can be towed, and/or subject to a $150 fine, many parkers pay little attention. This makes the restaurant owner both resigned and angry.

Kekayias, who declined to be photographed, says grimly, that persons parking on the spaces reserved for restaurant patrons, “do not have a right to park there under the law.” But then he notes, ruefully, that these days, he “can’t tow,” meaning that he cannot tow away cars that are not suppose to be parking in the restaurant’s parking lot.

Remembering for the Days When He Could Tow

“We used to be able to do so,” he says, “but no more.” “It is frustrating,” he says.  “Perhaps if I asked the police chief in town, I could tow,” he ruminates, but he does not sound very hopeful that he could get permission.

He also says that his restaurant can seat 50 people, and that these customers are entitled to the parking spaces closest to the restaurant.  But to him the situation appears to be pretty hopeless. He says, “I am just co-existing … [with the unauthorized parkers].”

As an example of the seriousness of the problem, he said that once even he could not find a parking spot next to his restaurant, because all of the spots were full. He also makes the point again and again, he pays to rent the parking spaces next to his restaurant.

There appears to be no practical solution as to how Pizza Works can limit its parking spaces, exclusively, to the restaurant’s customers. The yawning empty spaces, throughout much of the day are simply too tempting for non-dining  parkers to make use of.

Of course Kehayias could hire a parking attendant to keep non-restaurant customers from parking in the reserved restaurant parking spots. But, evidently, at this point, it is doubtful that the expense would make it worth it.

Read related stories in the series by Jerome Wilson:

Old Saybrook Railroad Station Parking Fees Could Increase from $5 to $10 a Day

200 New Parking Spaces to Be Added at the Old Saybrook Railroad Station

Old Saybrook Railroad Station Parking Fees Could Increase from $5 to $10 a Day

Railroad Parking Area sign

Railroad Parking Area sign

The daily parking fee on the privately owned parking lot, which is closest to the tracks at the Old Saybrook railroad station, could increase in the near future.  The present parking fee, which is $5 a day, could rise to $10 a day, according to Sebastian Lobo, the privately employed, parking attendant at the lot.

Lobo said that even with the increase, the cost for parking at Old Saybrook station would be far less than the amount charged at the New Haven railroad station.

However, a parking fee increase at one of the lots at the station would have no effect on the free-of-charge parking lots at the station, including, the Shore Line East Old Saybrook Commuter parking lot and the AMTRAK parking spaces at the station.  Nor would it affect the informal, free parking lot that extends along North Main Street from the Upper Cemetery almost all the way down to the tracks.

As for the 200 new parking spaces, which the state Department of Transportation plans to add at Old Saybrook rail station, it remains undecided as to whether there will be a parking fee or not for these spaces.

The Lot Where They Charge a Parking Fee  

The parking lot, where there is presently a $5.00 a day parking fee, is located right next to the relatively new, over the tracks terminal at the station.  For train passengers, it is clearly the most convenient place to park at the station.

These parking spaces are owned by Saybrook Realty Partners, whose address is 455 Boston Post Rd. in Old Saybrook, according to the collection envelopes put under the windshields of the cars parking there.

Collection envelopes can pile up under windshields

Collection envelopes can pile up under windshields

The border lines around the spaces owned by this group are white in color, and, generally, they are far from full.  Obviously, this is because most people parking at the station have found free spaces at other areas of the station.

Empty parking spaces at the pay for parking area

Empty parking spaces at the pay for parking area

The Collection Method of Paying for Parking

For those who pay for their parking at the station, there is a unique system of collecting parking fees.  First, parking attendant Lobo in his red car scoots around the lot, placing collection envelopes behind the windshields of the cars that are parked there.

Parking Attendant Lobo puts in place a collection envelope

Parking Attendant Lobo puts in place a collection envelope

These addressed envelopes instruct parkers to do three things: (1) put a $5 per day parking fee in the envelope, (2) place a stamp on the envelope, and (3) mail it.

The formal printed instructions on these envelopes read as follows:

$5.00 Daily Parking fee     

Please mail the $5.00 a day parking fee in this envelope. This parking lot is PRIVATE AND NO LONGER FREE. Amtrak travelers may park in the yellow lined designated area or pay the fee to park at will. Parking fees not paid within 14 days will be assessed an additional late fee of $10.00 per day.  YOUR LICENSE PLATE HAS BEEN NOTED Violators subject to tow at owner’s expense. For further information email parking@saybrookrealtypartners.com.

Plate Number _______________________________________________

Date _______________________________________________________

Enforcement Signs Threaten a $150 Fine

Signs around this Railroad Parking Area, as it is called, threaten significant consequences if parking fees are not paid.  “Violators Will Be Towed” and a “$150 Fine” will be imposed the signs say around the parking lot.

In an effort to obtain further information about this pay for parking organization, who declined an interview, we posed by email the following questions to Saybrook Realty Partners:

1) How many $150 fines have you imposed on persons who park on your spaces at the Old Saybrook railroad station?

2) How many $150 fines have you collected since you inaugurated a payment for parking scheme at the station?

3) How many cars have you towed for non-payment of parking fees?

4) How successful, generally, has been your return envelope payment system?

 Statement by Owner of Saybrook Realty Partners

Mr. David M. Adams, owner of Saybrook Realty Partners, which owns and manages Saybrook Junction, provided the following response, “The [Saybrook Realty  Partners’ parking] system has been very effective in preserving the integrity of the parking at Saybrook Junction for our 16 tenants. Saybrook Junction is a private business and has an obligation to provide parking for its business tenants and their customers, while also supporting Amtrak and overflow parking for Shoreline East commuters.  We continue to make progress to alleviate some of the parking concerns voiced by our tenants as well as commuters.”

A final article on the parking situation at the Old Saybrook railroad station will discuss the parking spaces that are controlled by the award-winning Pizza Works restaurant at the station. The restaurant has 38 reserved parking spaces close to the tracks.

200 New Parking Spaces to Be Added at the Old Saybrook Railroad Station

The rear of the lots, where AMTRAK parking is located

The rear of the lots, where AMTRAK parking is located

Old Saybrook First Selectman Carl Fortuna has confirmed in a recent interview that the Connecticut Department of Transportation, working with the Town of Old Saybrook, will soon formally announce a plan to add 200 new parking spaces at the railroad station in Old Saybrook.

The new parking spaces will require the purchase by the state Department of Transportation of 3.6 acres of private property, and negotiations for this purchase are presently underway. The new parking spaces will be situated on a site off  North Main Street, across the street from the Upper Cemetery.  The Upper Cemetery was established in 1750, and it is one of Old Saybrook’s historic landmarks.

Monies to acquire the 200 new parking spaces will come exclusively from the state, said the state’s Project Manager Keith Hall in a recent interview. There will be no federal funds involved in the purchase whatsoever, he emphasized.

Because of the good faith that has been shown in negotiating the sale of the property, Project Manager Hall also said that acquiring the property by eminent domain would not be necessary. Hall emphasized that to date there had been “fruitful discussions” with the property owners involved, and he anticipates that the final sale of the property would be consummated this coming April, if not before.

In discussing the planned acquisition of the new parking spaces, First Selectman Fortuna observed that the present parking situation at the Old Saybrook railroad station was “not ideal.”

The Present Parking Spaces at the Old Saybrook Station

The 200 new parking spaces at the station will add, substantially, to the number of parking spaces presently available at the station. One of the more informal of the existing parking lots at the station is the one that has a single string of parked cars running down North Main Street.

Cars parked beside the cemetery on North Main Street

Cars parked beside the cemetery on North Main Street

This ad hoc parking lot extends from next to the Upper Cemetery all the way down to the railroad tracks. During work days this informal “free” parking area is completely full.

Another significant parking area that also offers free parking is the Shore Line East, Old Saybrook, Commuter Parking lot.  This large lot has 137 parking spaces, with a few designated for handicap parking.

Colorful sign for Shore Line East Commuter Parking

Colorful sign for Shore Line East Commuter Parking

Although the Shore Line East parking lot is not directly beside the railroad station, it is still within easy walking distance of the trains. During work days the Shore Line East parking lot is frequently full.

AMTRAK Passenger Parking

In addition to these parking areas there are designated parking spaces for Amtrak passengers at the Old Saybrook railroad station. These Amtrak spaces are free, and they are indicated by painted yellow lines along their borders.

The Amtrak spaces are located just down from the Route 154 entrance to the railroad station property. This means that they are the furthest distance from where passengers get on and off their trains. Also, there are no designated parking spaces for handicapped Amtrak passengers, as there are in the Shore Line East Commuter Parking area.

Furthermore, the number of free-of-charge Amtrak parking spaces appears to be diminishing at the station.  Quite recently a number of Amtrak parking spaces were re-designated to be for the exclusive use of patients of a dermatologist with offices at the station. In the process Amtrak’s yellow boarders on these spaces have been painted over.

The considerable distance from the remaining Amtrak spaces to the train station can mean that a baggage-laden passenger, traveling on Amtrak, has further to walk to the train than any other passengers parking at the station.

One Hour Parking Spaces at the Station

Finally, there is another parking area that has at least a semblance of free parking. These are the spaces which are designated as offering just one hour of free parking, and no more. This means that if parkers decide to eat at Zhang’s Chinese Restaurant at the station, they better eat their shrimp chow mien with fried rice for lunch within an hour’s time.

However, it has to be said that this one hour limit does not appear to be strictly enforced by the private developer that owns much of the property around the railroad station.

Finally, it should be noted that the Old Saybrook railroad train station is in a unique category from among shoreline stations. This is because it serves both Shore Line East and Amtrak passengers. “It is not like the Guilford station that only serves Shore Line East passengers,” said DOT’s Project Manager Hall, when discussing the importance of the Old Saybrook railroad station. Of course it must also be sadly noted that Amtrak’s luxury train, the Acela, does not a stop at Old Saybrook. Rather, it insultingly barrels through the station at 80 or more miles an hour. Maybe it will stop for us someday.

A Portfolio of the Beauty of the Recent Snow Storm

A snow covered tree top surveys the scene

A snow covered tree top surveys the scene

Without question much damage was done by the recent snow storm. For some the lights and the power went out. Others were trapped in their homes for days because of the sheer massiveness of the snow storm.

Whereas below every element is covered with snow

Whereas below every element is covered with snow

Shoveling out was incredibly difficult. In many cases professional work crews had to dig people out.  Cars were buried; driveways were non-existent and getting to the store was a major undertaking.

Two straining trees, their branches bent with the weight of snow

Two straining trees, their branches bent with the weight of snow

Still, there was a memorable beauty to the storm. It created whole new worlds of splendor. Soon enough it degenerated into muddy piles of dirt and snow, but in its fullest glory here is what it looked like.

The sun illuminates the snowy scene

The sun illuminates the snowy scene

The deer look at us as we look at them

The deer look at us as we look at them

Middlesex Hospital Breaks Ground for New Shoreline Medical Center in Westbrook

“Shovelers,” left to right, Noel Bishop, First Selectman of Westbrook; Vincent G. Capece, President & CEO, Middlesex Hospital; Harry Evert, Senior Vice Presidennt, Middlesex Hospital; Christopher Seaton, Chairmain of the Board of Directors, Middlesex Health Systems; Darlene Briggs, Chairwoman, Westbrook Division, Middlesex Chamber of Commerce; and Larry McHugh, President Middlesex Chamber of Commerce.

Westbrook First Selectman Noel Bishop was all smiles at the October 10 official groundbreaking ceremonies of the new Middlesex Hospital Shoreline Medical Center, scheduled to open in Westbrook in 2014. Bishop should be pleased, because for the past 37 years Middlesex Hospital has been operating its Shoreline Medical Center in neighboring Essex, and now the clinic is moving to Westbrook.

When the Medical Center moves from Essex to Westbrook, it is uncertain as to what the Hospital will do with the Essex facility. A number of possibilities are being assessed.

Worth noting is the fact that both Westbrook First Selectman Noel Bishop and Old Saybrook First Selectman Carl Fortuna were on hand for the ceremonies. However, Essex First Selectman Norman Needleman was unable to attend the celebration.

There was Included in the tent of notables, which had been set up off the Tanger Outlets, were the President and CEO of Middlesex Hospital, the Chairman of its Board of Directors, local Chamber of Commerce executives, among other dignitaries. Also, attending were over a hundred well wishers standing under a breezy tent that protected those present on a blowy and sunny afternoon.

Past History of Middlesex Hospital’s Outreach Medical Services

At the groundbreaking a number of speakers noted that that it was over 40 years ago that Middlesex Hospital made its decision to expand its emergency medical services out into the shoreline communities. In fact, the first “out placing” of emergency medical services by Middlesex Hospital took place in a single small building located along Main Street in Centerbrook.

This facility was a great success, and it demonstrated that there truly was a need for an outreach of emergency medical services along the shoreline. Then, in 1975 the hospital moved its Shoreline Medical Center from Centerbrook to a piece of privately donated land on Westbrook Road in Essex.

The Essex shoreline clinic to be phased out in 2014

Providing emergency medical services will continue to be offered at this Essex location up until the new Medical Center opens. Then, after that all emergency medical services will be provided at the new facility in Westbrook.  The exact of address of the new facility will be will be 250 Flat Rock Place in Westbrook.

A Brand New Chapter for Emergency Medical Care

As the hospital’s Chairman of the Board of Directors, Christopher Seaton, put it, “Times have changed.” Or, as the hospital’s President & CEO Vincent G. Capece said, “This is a brand new chapter for high quality, emergency medical care.”

Also, cited by the parade of speakers was the fact that the new Shoreline Medical Center in Westbrook would be 44,000 square feet in size, which is twice the size of the present facility in Essex. Others noted that there will be plenty of parking at the new emergency facility, as well as, perhaps the most obvious advantage of all; the clinic’s location will be very close to Exit 65 on I-95, a heavily traveled Interstate.

87,000 Visits Annually at Essex Clinic

To illustrate the enormous success of the concept of off-site emergency medical care, the Essex facility is now seeing 87,000 patient visits annually. One speaker termed the off-site formula of medical care as, “a humanistic approach to medicine.”

It also appears to be a very profitable approach, one where you can not only double the size of your present facility, but leave enough room on the land to treble the size, if necessary.

While the Speakers Spoke, the Nearby Bulldozers Roared

During the remarks in the tent on the grounds of the Tanger Outlets, just down the road on the right hand side, going towards I-95, there was a huge amount of earth moving going on. Across an expanse of land that was until a week or so ago a heavily forested area, the ground was now being leveled to make way for the new emergency clinic.

The site being cleared for a 44,000 square foot shoreline clinic building in Westbrook

Large boulders, which were just a few days ago were underground, were now stacked up in one gigantic mound. Everything was being done to level a shelf of land for the building that will house Middlesex Hospital’s new Shoreline Medical Center.

Giant earth mover that is being used at site of new Shoreline Clinic

Factually speaking, it was here at the construction site, where the first, true groundbreaking took place, perhaps a week or so ago.  Furthermore, the dress of those who participated in this first “groundbreaking” wore work clothes and not business suits, although perhaps a suit or two came by for a brief look.

Still, the vision, and the willingness to take large risks to adopt a new and growing approach to providing medical care, belonged to those who wore the suits and spoke at the ceremonies under the tent up the road from the construction site.

Nine Features for the New Clinic’s Success

As for the nine primary features of this new facility, they were listed on one of the tent walls as follows: 1) Improved location; 2) Double the size of our current facility; 3) Expanded emergency center; 4) Improve patient privacy: 5) Separate entrance to outpatient center; 6) Lab services; 7) Infusion therapy; 8) Expanded radiology services; and 9) Designated Women’s imaging area.

Of this list perhaps the first, “Improved location,” is the most important. The new Westbrook location, although certainly not as desirable for Essex residents, for other shoreline residents, the new location on I-95 will be far more convenient and accessible.
Residents of Old Lyme and Lyme, and even Niantic , now have simply to get on I-95 for quick access to the facility. Old Saybrook, Westbrook and Clinton residents will also have easier access to a facility on I-95. Also, residents in the towns along Route 9, which merges seamlessly into I-95, will also have greater ease of access.

In a way the new location is a “win, win” for almost everyone. The hospital can address increased patient volumes and patients get more accessible medical care in an expanded and more modern facility.

Artist’s rendering of the proposed new Middlesex Hospital Shoreline Medical Center in Westbrook

Little Fenwick’s Historic Commission Orders Big Time Developer to Lower Posts, and Wins

This story involves a dispute between the Borough of Fenwick Historic Distrcit Commission and a very large, New York City developer, Frank J. Sciame, Jr. In the end the Historic Commission won the case, and developer Sciame lost.

In the Fenwick Historic Commission’s review of Sciame’s massive reconstruction of Katherine Hepburn’s former estate, the Historic Commission had one quibble. That was that the two, new granite posts at the entrance to the estate, were simply too high.

Former Katherine Hepburn estate now owned by Frank Sciame

Therefore, the Historic Commission ordered the developer to lower the height of both of the two posts from their  height of 60 inches to a lower height of 48 inches. Sciame duly responded to the Commission’s request — but not exactly in the way that the Commission intended.

How Not to Measure the True Height of Posts

Rather than simply slicing 12 inches off the tops of both posts, Sciame built around the base of the posts, two flower beds, each of which were 12 inches high. Sciame then advised the Historic Commission that he had complied with its order, because if you measured the posts from the top of the flower beds to the top of the posts, the height of both posts was 48 inches.

Furthermore, Sciame told the Historic Commission, if it did not like this way of doing things, it should take him to court. The Fenwick Historic Commission did just that, and the result was a ruling by State Superior Court Judge Robert L. Holzberg that was a “win, win” for the Fenwick Historic Commission.

The Judge in his opinion held, “[T]he most reasonable interpretation of the [Fenwick Historic Commission’s] order [to lower the height of the posts] is that the pillars must be reduced in height such that from the roadbed or whatever location that they are anchored into the ground, the height of the top of the pillar is forty eight inches.” In short, Sciame’s attempt to measure the height of the posts from the top of the flower beds was rejected by the court.

No Fines Imposed Because of Developer’s “Good Faith”

Nevertheless, the Court held at the end of its seven page decision, that, “Because of the good faith dispute over the appropriate interpretation of the [Fenwick Historic Commission’s] order, the court declines to impose fines for non-compliance with the [Fenwick Historic Commission’s] order.”

The Court also ordered compliance with its order, “within 45 days of this judgment.” Since the court’s decision was rendered on August 2, “within 45 days” would mean that the posts should have been shortened by September 16.

Although the developer may have missed the court’s deadline by several days, an inspection on October 6 revealed that both of the posts at the entrance to the estate have been neatly sliced off from the top, and the height of both posts are now 48 inches, from the ground up.

Both gate posts now shortened to 48 inches high

Middlesex Hospital to Hold a Ground Breaking of Its New Westbrook Facility that Will Replace the Shoreline Clinic in Essex

Artist’s rendering of the proposed new Middlesex Hospital Shoreline Medical Center in Westbrook

Moving rapidly, with its plan to replace its present Shoreline Clinic on Route 153 in Essex with a new facility in Westbrook, Middlesex Hospital will hold a Groundbreaking Ceremony at the Tanger Outlets in Westbrook on Wednesday. October 10 at 4:30 pm for invited guests.  The Tanger Outlets is located at 314 Flat Rock Place in Westbrook.  The new Westbrook facility of Middlesex Hospital will be located just down the road from the Tanger Outlets, which is just off Exit 65 on I-95.

The Middlesex Hospital Shoreline Medical Center has been in existence in its current location since 1975, and was the first, freestanding emergency department in the country.

Middlesex Hospital chose to build a new Shoreline Medical Center because the current facility’s size and land is being used to maximum capacity. There is no available space to add needed services, and existing services are being squeezed because treatment areas cannot accommodate all the technology that medicine today demands.  Also, the existing location cannot house an additional structure to “right size” the facility and allow for future expansion.

The new location in Westbrook will address all of these factors, as well as providing convenient access to emergency and diagnostic care for the tens of thousands of patients that use the Middlesex Hospital Shoreline Medical Center every year.

Westbrook First Selectman Noel Bishop said, “Westbrook is extremely excited that the new clinic will be located here in Westbrook. It is a fantastic opportunity for our town.” Bishop also noted that the Exit 65 location of the new clinic was just across the highway from the State Police station, and that the new medical center, “will be a great service to our [shoreline] communities.”

Essex First Selectman Norman Needleman said, “The Shoreline Clinic has been a wonderful and positive part of our Essex community for many years, and we are sad to see them move. However, it is our hope that Middlesex Hospital will continue to provide some medical services from their present building here in Essex.”

The Preserve Comes to Essex – Local Property Owners Take Action to Stop It

Lot 4, the knoll on which developers want a home site, and opponents see unacceptable runoffs

A “Grade A” controversy has broken out over a proposed new development on Ingham Hill Road in Essex. The proposed new development , which is sponsored by the developer of the now- stalled 1,000 acre Preserve in Old Saybrook, River Sound Development LLC, is now seeking to get town approvals for a new 36-acre, six lot development located on Ingham Hill Road in Essex.

Map of Ingham Hill Road development. The Essex/Old Saybrook boundary runs along the bottom

The property to be development in Essex abuts the town’s boundary with Old Saybrook, and it is on the right hand side of Ingham Hill Road, when looking up towards Plains Road (Route 153).

Neighbors Oppose Development

A group of three neighboring property owners on Ingham Hill Road are dead set against the proposed development, and at the August 23rd meeting of the Essex Planning Commission they filled an Intervention Pleading, so as to become a part of the approval process. This pleading was granted by the Planning Commission, which then entertained an almost two hour period for the interveners to make their case against the new development.

The Ingham Hill Road interveners were: Judith Bombaci, Kenneth Bombaci and Suellen McCuin.  The Bombacis are members of a well established family in Essex, and in fact there are no less than fifteen listings under “Bombaci” in the Essex section of YP Shoreline telephone directory. Ms McCuin has been a strong opponent of the development, since it was first announced.

Familiar “Bombaci Tree Experts” road sign on Plains Road.

Extensive Arguments Against the Project

Speakers who spoke in opposition to the Ingham Hill Road development were lead by the interveners’ attorney, Christopher J. Smith of the law firm of Shipman & Goodwin LLP in Hartford. Also, two Certified Professional Wetland Scientists from Rema Ecological Services, LLC,  (REMA), George T. Logan and Sigrun N. Gadwa, spoke against the project among other members of the interveners’ team.

Attorney Smith also submitted to the Planning Commission an “Opposition Packet,” which contained extensive written arguments against the new development, as well as typography charts of the development site prepared by the developer’s own engineer, Doane – Collins Engineering Associates, LLC, and professional biographies of the wetland scientists and Attorney Smith.

Air and Water Pollution Concerns Expressed

“We are in strong opposition to this subdivision,” Attorney Smith said in his testimony at the Essex Planning Commission hearing. “The property has significant natural resources,” he said, including “landmark trees” on the site, some of which are 120 to 140 years old.

Lot 2, the home site that the Essex Wetlands Commission rejected

Also, the interveners’ attorney said that the proposed Ingham Hill Road development, “will have, or is reasonably likely to have, the effect of causing the unreasonable pollution, impairment or destruction of the air, water or other natural resource of the State of Connecticut located on, and off, the subject property…”

In addition, the attorney made the troublesome charge that the developer of the Ingham Hill Road project had not disclosed during its  appearance at an earlier hearing of the Wetlands Commission, the project’s adverse effects from the “substantial clear cutting of landmark trees and vegetation, and site development including a septic system and dwelling immediately upland and in close proximity to an off-site pond and on-site intermittent watercourse …”

This “failure to disclose” charge could be a troubling for the developer, if it were proved that it failed to state significant environmental impacts of the project, which the Wetlands Commission was entitled to hear.  The Wetland Commission in an earlier proceeding approved the building of five of the six home sites proposed on the site, but disapproved of Lot 2 of the development.

Smith’s objections to the project were further amplified in a letter by Rema Ecological Services, LLC, of Manchester, Connecticut (REMA), to the Essex Planning Commission. The REMA letter asserted that “development of the subject property … would result in both short-term and long-term impacts … through sedimentation and surface water quality degradation.”

Spotted Turtles, Wood Frogs and Songbirds at Risk

In addition, the REMA letter asserted that, “Due to the taking of valuable upland habitats, including significant mature trees, and the fragmentation of the landscape, resulting in greatly reduced ecological integrity, wildlife resources at the site would be unreasonably impacted and impaired, including uncommon species such as the spotted turtle, a keystone species, such as the wood frog, and the whole guild of area-sensitive neotropical migrant songbirds.”

Also, REMA wetland scientists wrote that, “water resources, both on-site and off-site, will be impaired both during the construction phase, through erosion and sedimentation, and following it, by impairing surface water quality.”

Bombaci Pond Could Be Adversely Affected   

The REMA testimony mentioned that, “The proposed location of the house in Lot 5 is directly over a natural, frequently flowing stormwater conveyance channel that feeds the Bombaci Pond. The Bombaci Pond is visible from Ingham Hill Road and is an important part of the streetscape.”

Photo of Bombaci Pond. Members of Bombaci family challenged the development

One can speculate that the direct negative impact on the Bombaci Pond may have been a factor in motivating the Bombaci interveners to challenge the proposed development.

In conclusion, the REMA letter said, “With the possible exception of Lot 3, the lots in the proposed conventional subdivision are not feasible, in our professional opinion.”

The Developer’s Response to the Attacks on Its Project

At the conclusion of the presentation by those opposing the new development on Ingham Hill Road, the developer attorney, Brian Smith of the law firm of Robinson & Cole in Hartford, initially appeared to be taken aback by the drum role of hostile testimony against his client’s proposed development.

Smith, who is no relation to the interveners’ attorney, Stephen Smith, said to the Planning Commission that he hoped that he would be given the chance to respond to the attacks against his client’s proposed development at the next meeting of the Planning Commission on September 13. He also said that the developer needed the approval of at least six home sites “to make the project work.” Planning Commission Chairman Tom Danyliw assured Smith that he would be granted an opportunity to be heard at the next Commission hearing.

The 1,000 Acre Preserve Proposal Still Alive

In what turned out to be something of a coda to the hearing on the Ingham Hill Road development, a resident of Old Saybrook, who was at the Essex hearing, said that he wanted to make sure that the Commission understood that the proposed development in Essex was a part of the Preserve sponsor’s larger plan to develop its property in both Essex and Old Saybrook.

Chairman Danyliw treated the citizen intervener courteously, and allowed him to present a quick slide show to buttress his point that the Preserve developer still had long range plans to develop its 1,000 acre site in Old Saybrook, and that this proposed development in Essex, was just a part of this long range plan.

In fact, the interveners’ petition by Attorney Stephen Smith also took  note of the fact the developer’s Essex application, “is part of an overall site development of a 1,000 acre parcel, which involves, in part,  substantial stormwater discharge onto the subject  property and directly or indirectly into a watercourse or intermittent watercourse with a vernal pool habitat,” and, “thereby unreasonably impairing such resources.”

All this shows that in spite of over a decade of disappointments in its effort to develop its 1,000 acre parcel of virgin land in Old Saybrook,  that this attempt to develop its property in Essex, clearly demonstrates that the developer of what was once called the Preserve, has yet to give up, and go away.

Perfect Timing for Discussion of Dire Events in Egypt at Foreign Policy Forum in Old Lyme

Dr. Steven Cook of the Council for Foreign Relations, who spoke about Egypt

The timing could not have been more perfect. The very day that the Southeast Connecticut Committee on Foreign Relations (“SECCFR”) held its regular monthly meeting featuring a speaker on Egypt, the Supreme Court of that country dissolved the Egyptian parliament.

The Egypt specialist, who addressed SECCFR that afternoon on June 14, was Dr. Steven Cook, a nationally recognized expert on Egypt and the new Middle East. Dr. Cook is presently the Hasib J. Sabbagh senior fellow for Middle Eastern Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.

Also, he has an upcoming new book is entitled, “The Struggle for Egypt: From Nasser to Tahrir Square,” to be published by the Oxford University Press. However, because of the rapidly changing events in Egypt, Dr. Cook said that he has had to update his book, constantly, before it before it goes to press.

In his remarks Dr. Cook also admitted that his wife has been complaining lately that he has been spending too much time in Tahrir Square in Cairo rather than at their home in Washington.

A Pessimistic Outlook for Egypt

In his remarks before an audience of over hundred persons in a meeting room at the First Congregational Church in Old Lyme, Dr. Cook was generally pessimistic about the present political climate in Egypt, a country that is the largest nation by far in the Middle East. He said that these days only two groups hold real political power in Egypt. They are: (1) the military generals left in place from President Hosni Mubarak’s 30 years of rule, and (2) a newly empowered Muslim Brotherhood Party with an Islamist agenda.

Audience at SECCFR meeting in Old Lyme

This in turn has left little room in the nation’s political power structure for a Western-leaning, democratic center, a development which Dr. Cook feels is very unfortunate.

As for the format of Dr. Cook’s remarks, he followed the custom at SECCFR meetings by limiting his remarks to one hour. The first half hour he spoke from notes as to the current situation in Egypt, and in the second half hour he answered questions from the audience.

Informal discussion with Dr. Cook after the meeting

Also, as is customary after the formal meeting of the group, Dr. Cook and a couple dozen of SECCFR members went out to dinner at a local restaurant for informal discussions.

Local Business Leaders Direct SECCFR

The Chairman of SECCFR is Rowland Ballek. Ballek is a familiar business figure along the Connecticut shoreline, having recently retired as Chairman of the Essex Savings Bank. As for SECCFR in Ballek’s view, “People are very interested world affairs, especially recent developments.”

Chairman Rowland Ballek and Executive Director Bill Chatman of SECCFR

To satisfy this interest, since 1999 the organization has been holding regular meetings which feature presentations by foreign policy specialists. The forums are generally held monthly, except in July and August.

The Executive Director of SECCFR is another retired business leader. He is Bill Chatman, who is a former CEO and Managing Director of Foster Wheeler Limited, an Engineering Contracting company based in the United Kingdom.  At SECCFR, Chatman’s job is to find and invite the speakers who address the monthly meetings of the group. Chatman sees the mission of SECCFR, “to try to educate people about what is going on in the world outside the United States.”

In addition to Ballek and Chatman, the Secretary of SECCFR is Martha Gibson, PhD. About SECCFR she says, “It is rare to have a local venue that offers an interactive forum on critical foreign affairs,” adding, “I am amazed by the array of backgrounds among our members.”

The Group’s Mission Statement

SECCFR’s mission statement notes that the group’s “principal activity is to provide a forum for non-partisan, no-advocacy dialogue between its members and eminent speakers on foreign relations.” It also states,   “SECCFR is committed to hosting the widest possible range of views while advocating none. By maintaining a reputation for impartiality, the Committee facilitates civil discussion on issues that bear directly on American’s global interests.”

The speakers that addressed SECCFR meetings during the fall 2011 and through the spring of 2012 are typical. SECCFR meetings are both at the church in Old Lyme, as well as on-campus at Connecticut College in New London.

Recent Speakers at SECCFR Meetings

Last September a former U.S. Ambassador, Kenneth Brill, spoke on, “The Breakdown of American Diplomatic Effectiveness.”

Then in October another former Ambassador, Wayne L. Cutler, spoke on developments in North African and the Arabian Peninsula.

In November Dr. Joel Sokolsky addressed the group on Canadian and American security interests, and in December, foreign policy specialist, Wayne Merry, spoke on the provocative theme, “Back to the European Drawing Board” regarding “the German Question” and “America’s Trans-Atlantic Role.”

After skipping the next month, in February SECCFR members heard remarks by Dr. Mohsen M. Milani, Chair of a Florida university’s Government and International Affairs Department, who spoke of a possible change in U.S. policy towards Iran’s building a nuclear weapon.

This was followed in March by remarks by Linda Chatman Thomsen, Esp., a former Director of the Division of Enforcement at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, who spoke on U.S. laws that regulate American businesses in foreign markets.

At the April meeting Ambassador Morton Abramowitz spoke on, “Turkey: New Myths, New Realities.”  The speaker is a former President of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Then at the May meeting the speaker was Professor Shelly Rigger, who spoke about the importance of Taiwan and its relationship to China. The speaker is fluent in Chinese, and she holds a doctorate in Government from Harvard University.

SECCFR Never Pays Speakers’ Fees

SECCFR has a policy of not paying speakers’ fees. However, it does reimburse speakers for their incidental expenses, such as lodging and travel expenses.

As for those persons who wish to become members of SECCFR, the regular membership is $125 a year, and there are associate and student memberships at a lower rate. Also, any person interested in joining is invited attend two of the organization’s meetings without charge to see if they would like to join.

Those interested in becoming a member of SECCFR should contact the group’s Secretary, Martha Gibson, PhD. She can be reached at her office at Merrill Wealth Management, 100 Eugene O’Neill Drive, New London, CT  06320-6402; or by telephone at 860-447-7400.

Courtney Supports Effort to Dredge Westbrook Harbor with a $500,000 Federal “Earmark”

Westbrook First Selectman Noel Bishop (on left) with Cong. Joe Courtney and State Senator Eileen Daily celebrating new harbor dredging dollars

“This earmark had wings,” called out an excited Rives Potts at the ceremony to celebrate Congressman Courtney’s $500,000 federal earmark to dredge Westbrook Harbor. The recent ceremony was held at Pilots Point Marina in Westbrook. Potts, the Vice President and General Manager of the marina, will directly benefit from the new dredging of Westbrook harbor.

The Pilots Point Marina has a public, gas dock right in the harbor, and the deeper the harbor is dredged, the greater the number of deep draft vessels can be served by the marina’s gas dock.

Pilots Point Manager Rives Potts gives thumbs up to new federal earmark

In addition to helping a local marina, Town of Westbrook First Selectman Noel Bishop, who chaired the Courtney gathering, saw many other economic development benefits to the Town of Westbrook, when it has a deeper harbor.  The money spent by boat-arriving visitors will help the town “in many, many ways,” Bishop said. He mentioned specifically restaurants, food markets and other local businesses.

An interesting sidelight to the earmark that Courtney ultimately directed to Westbrook is that originally these earmark monies had been directed to new projects in neighboring Old Saybrook. However, with the agreement of Old Saybrook First Selectman Carl Fortuna, who attend the Courtney event, the monies were “reprogrammed,” so that they could be spent on dredging Westbrook’s Harbor instead.

With Senator Daily in center, and sporting a broken ankle, are supporters of the $500,000 federal earmark

Many Old Saybrook boat owners moor their vessels in Westbrook Harbor, so the argument can easily be made that dredging Westbrook Harbor means helping Old Saybrook boaters as well as those of Westbrook.

As for the timetable of dredging Westbrook Harbor, dredging will not actually begin until October of this year. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will have overall supervision of the project, and the Corps’ dredger boat, “Currituck,” will be used.  The performance of the actual work will be done by a local Westbrook contractor, Patchogue River Dredging.

According to a number of persons at the ceremony, Westbrook Harbor was last dredged in the early nineties.

$1.1 in state grants for dredging from State Senator Daley 

Although the recent celebration of the Courtney- sponsored $500,000 federal earmark was certainly appropriate, Westbrook State Senator Eileen Daily has already arranged a total of $1,100,000 in Connecticut state funds for dredging Westbrook Harbor.

These state funds were appropriated in two separate implements by the Senator, one for $350,000, and the second for $750,000. Considering the magnitude of these amounts, the Senator must be considered the leader in getting the monies necessary for dredging Westbrook Harbor.

In the Connecticut state legislature Daily holds the powerful position of Chair of the Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee. From this position, especially in the finance area, she can wield considerable power in the choice of funding state projects, as she certain has appeared to have done in the case of dredging Westbrook Harbor.

On hand to celebrate are Westbrook's Noel Bishops, State Rep. Jim Crawford, Cong. Courtney and Pilots Point's Rives Potts

As for the Courtney earmark Daily said, “Congressman Courtney’s federal grant will serve a very useful purpose in the Westbrook Harbor dredging project.” However, when the history of dredging of Westbrook Harbor is written, most likely Daily’s name will be mentioned as the project’s leading fund raiser.

Getting a federal earmark entails a lot of effort

In his remarks at the ceremony Congressman Courtney noted that the official name of the federal earmark program is the “Restore America’s Prominence Act,” and its grants are called “RAPA grants.” Courtney confirmed that getting these grants is an extremely competitive process among the nation’s Members of Congress.

Ed O’Donnell, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer’s representative at the event said, “Without the dogged help of Congressman Courtney, this money would have gone elsewhere.” A number of others at the Courtney event characterized the Congressman as being. “a dogged sponsor, absolutely unrelenting” in his efforts to obtain the earmark grant.

Chester Airport, the Shoreline’s Gateway to the Sky

The Chester Airport is thriving on a hilltop

Chester Airport in a sense is already up in the sky. The airport is located at the top of a 415 foot prominence, towering over the surrounding landscape below.  The airport’s street address is 59 Winthrop Road in Chester, and it is located a few miles west of Exit 6, off Route 9.

Chester Airport of course provides routine aviation services for the takeoffs and landings of general aviation aircraft. The airport has a single 2700 foot long runway and has personnel on duty to greet incoming aircraft during normal daylight business hours.

Chester-based pilot Bruno Kitka takes off in his Piper Seneca bound for Schenectady

Also, like many general aviation airports, Chester Airport offers air taxi service for traveling business persons and vacationers. Frequent destinations are to New York and Boston, and to vacation spots such as Nantucket, Bar Harbor, and even the Caribbean.

These chartered, general aviation flights are provided by Chester Charter, Inc., which can be reached at 860-526-4321, or at www.chester-charter.com.  Still handling these routine airport services is only one of the services that Chester Airport provides to the area’s aviation community.

The “Discovery flights” at Chester Airport

The airport is also the jumping off place for aerial sightseeing tours of the beautiful Connecticut River valley, courtesy of Chester Charter. To get you started in the air, the company offers a ½ hour “Discovery flight.” The cost of this introductory flight is about what you would pay for a dinner for two at a local Chester restaurant.

Chester Charter also offers more extensive air passenger rides for one to four passengers. Cessna aircraft are used for these flights, and the cost comes to about $150 per passenger on a four passenger flight.  The taking of aerial photography is a favorite on these flights.

Then, if you want to bring out the Red Baron in you,* there is the unique option of flying in the open cockpit of a Boeing  Stearman, a vintage, 1941 biplane.  This exhilarating flying experience is priced accordingly, and we shall leave it at that.  The “de rigueur” outfit for a flight in the Stearman are goggles and a leather hat that covers the ears.

Taking up water-filled balloons to drop on the ground below, from the open cockpit of the Stearman, is not allowed, as tempting as that may be.

Learn to fly at Chester Charter flight school

Beyond the thrills of airplane rides and aerial sightseeing, Chester Airport also offers serious flight training courses at the Chester Charter Flight School.  Chester Charter partner, Jean Dow, is at the airport to help would-be pilots started in learning to fly.

Chester Charter partner Jean Dow says, "Learn to fly here"

Flight training at the flight school includes a ground school with eleven hours of instruction. Chester Carter uses Jappesen products for its ground school, and miscellaneous materials, such as charts and directories are provided to flight school students as well.

Chester Charter flight school is also a Cessna flight training center, and it uses Cessna 152’s and Cessna 172’s aircraft.

The amount of instructional flying time in the air, required to become an FAA certified pilot, varies immensely. Although the minimum air time required by the FAA is as low as 40 hours (20 in flight hours with an instructor and 20 in flight hours solo), this is the bare minimum required. Also, it is rarely appropriate for student flyers.

In fact, the national average for the completion of FAA flight training is 72.8 hours in the air, well above the 40 hour FAA minimum.

As for the cost of tuition at the flight school it is more affordable than some might think.  By the time you are certified as a pilot, it is certainly much, much less than a single year of college tuition costs these days. And you have learned to fly!

Maintaining your aircraft at Chester Airport

In addition to teaching students to fly at the Chester Airport, there is an extensive aircraft maintenance facility at the airport called the Chester Charter Airplane Factory. The Factory is essentially an aircraft maintenance and service facility, which is accessible both to aircraft permanently based at the Chester Airport, as well as transient aircraft.

The Factory also hosts Stellar Aironics, which services and repairs aircraft radar and ground positioning systems.

Renting hangar space for aircraft

The Chester Airport also rents hangar space on a long term basis, as well as short term space for transient aircraft. There is interior space in the long line of hangars down the airport’s single runway, as well as “tie down” spaces in the open air on the tarmac.  The average in-hangar rental for a two-seated aircraft is $250 a month, according to James A. Olson, the Airport Manager.

Indoor storage of aircraft at Chester Airport

Olson also holds the title of Corporate Vice President of Aviation of Whelen Engineering Company, Inc. He says that, “Since the airport’s rejuvenation, after the Whelen family bought the airport 20 years ago, the place has been thriving.” “Presently, 100 plus airplanes are based here,” he notes, adding that “there is a long waiting list for an open spot in one of the airport’s hangars.”

As for the size of aircraft that can land and take off at Chester Airport, the airport’s helicopter pad is big enough to accommodate large helicopters. Also, it can handle the take offs and landings of large, multi-engine aircraft as well. However, Chester Airport, obviously, cannot accommodate modern day, jumbo jets.

The typical pilots who fly the planes at Chester Airport

Airport Manager Olson has some unique insights into the pilots who fly out of Chester Airport. “Generally, they fly smaller planes,” he says, “predominately on weekends.” Also, favored destinations of the weekend flyers are smaller airports that have a good restaurant nearby.

Chester-based pilot Bruno Kitka with his Piper Seneca

“They know where the good restaurants are,” Olson says in admiration.   Once they have landed and eaten at their restaurants of choice, the pilots fly back home to Chester. Computing the cost of this one day flight plan can be as much as $200, or more, mainly because of the high cost of aviation fuel to make the trip. The lunch itself is a minor expense.

Just come out and watch the planes

Airport Manager Olson without reservation says, “Visitors are always welcome at the airport.” “It is good to see people satisfying their aviation curiosity,” he says with a smile. As for his own flying experience Olson says, “I started flying, when I was 13 years old.”

Airport Manager Jim Olson, started flying at age 13

Chester Airport is indeed a wonderful place to visit on a clear, clear sunny day, even if you have absolutely no intention of flying anywhere. Just go out and lean on the sparkling white fence, next to the runway, and watch the aircraft take off and land.

People frequently speak of “the wonder of flight.” Evidence of that wonder is in our midst at Chester Airport.

______________________________________________________

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­*The “Red Baron” was the German ace, Manfred von Richthofen, who had 80 confirmed kills in World War 1. The Red Baron himself was killed near the end of the war.

Judge of Probate Terrance Lomme, Busy With Probate Cases, and Non-Probate Matters as Well

Judge of Probate Terrance Lomme

Judge of Probate Terrance Lomme has immense responsibilities, as a sitting judge of probate for nine towns in eastern Connecticut.  Not only is he the judicial officer who determines the validity of Wills for probate in these towns, he also has many other judicial tasks that are unrelated to probating Wills.

The responsibilities of Judge Lomme not related to Wills include: 1) appointing guardians for persons with intellectual disabilities, 2) approving sterilization and placement of persons with intellectual disabilities, and 3) appointing conservators for persons found incapable of caring for themselves.

Also, Judge Lomme has the power to: 1) remove unfit parents as guardians of their children, 2) hear claims of paternity of unwed fathers, 3) terminate the parental rights of parents, who cannot fulfill their parental responsibilities, and 4) grant adoptions.

In addition, Judge Lomme is empowered to: 1) grant changes of name, 2) approve or disapprove the marriage of persons under the age of 16, and 3) assist persons in obtaining passports, which he usually refers to U.S. Post Office down the street.

Also, in cases of deceased persons, who died without a Will, Judge Lomme is charged with the responsibility of apportioning the assets of the deceased in accordance with statutory requirements.

The nine towns in Judge Lomme’s judicial district

The nine towns in Judge Lomme’s judicial district are: Chester, Clinton, Deep River, Essex, Haddam, Killingworth, Lyme, Old Saybrook and Westbrook, and his suite of offices are located on the second floor of the Town Hall of Old Saybrook.

To assist him in exercising his judicial responsibilities, Judge Lomme has a staff of nine, lead by his Chief Clerk, Valerie Shickel. To adjudicate the matters under his jurisdiction, Judge Lomme says that he holds on average from 15 to 20 hearings a week. Hearings are held in a room across the hall from his main suite of offices, and they are open to the public. In conducting the hearings Judge Lomme wears a suit and not a judge’s robe.

Judge of Probate offices in Old Saybrook Town Hall

In many cases there are fees involved, when a party appears before Judge Lomme, most especially in probate matters. In some cases these fees can run into thousands of dollars. These fees are paid with the application regardless of whether there is a hearing. Usually the fees in matters involving Wills are covered by taking the money from the estate of the deceased. Also, the monies collected, obviously, go to the state and not to the judge.

The annual salary of Judge Lomme as a Judge of Probate is $110,000  a year.

The qualifications of Judge of Probate Lomme

Judge Lomme brings an extensive background to the position of Judge of Probate. Elected in 2010, Judge Lomme has over thirty years of experience in practicing law. He also holds a Juris Doctor degree from Quinnipiac University, and he is a graduate of Eastern Connecticut College.

When characterizing his present position as a Judge of Probate over nine towns in Connecticut, Judge Lomme says, “I have a pretty full plate.”

Even though judges of the Superior Court, the Appellate Courts and the Supreme Court of the state are prohibited from practicing law for private clients, this is not the case for the state’s Judges of Probate.  

Because of his very full plate as a Judge of Probate, even though he knew that he could continue to practice law, Judge Loome has radically reduced his private law practice. He has resigned as a partner of his law firm and now holds the less demanding position as Of Counsel. Also, he has reduced the number of clients that he has at his firm, from 150 to 10, according to the judge.

Representing a “high profile” client in Essex

Judge Lomme is presently representing a “high profile” private client in the Town of Essex. The client, a New York City developer, is seeking to develop 11 acres of land on Foxboro Point. Foxboro Point is considered one of the most beautiful areas in Essex, and the Judge’s client is seeking to build seven new homes on a parcel, which is located directly on North Cove of the Connecticut River.

Judge Lomme representing Foxboro Point developer at hearing

In his capacity as a private lawyer representing the developer, Judge Lomme to date has appeared at public hearings of both the Essex Inland Waterways and Watercourses Commission and the Essex Planning Commission.

The Inland Waterways Commission held that the developer’s plans were outside its jurisdiction. However, there could be opposition to the Foxboro Point development at the Planning Commission hearing, coming up on March 8. Should this opposition occur, most likely, Judge Lomme as private counsel would seek to refute it.

Judge Lomme will also accompany the developer’s Civil Engineer, Joe Wren, as he conducts a “site walk” for the members of the Planning Commission on March 3, as Wren did previously for the members of the Inland Wetlands Commission.

Judge Lomme characterizes his assignment for the private developer at Foxboro Point as “zoning work.” As such he deems it totally appropriate for a Judge of Probate to assume a private counsel’s role. Also he says that this kind of work “works out well, because I can do it nights and weekends.”

Stating that he has “a heightened sensitivity to conflicts,” Judge Lomme says that he would recuse himself, if a member of the Essex Planning Commission came before his court during the Foxboro Point development’s approval process. He also says he would expect a member of the Planning Commission to do the same, and not vote on the Foxboro Point project, if they had a case before his court.

Some observers feel that it is only a question of time before Judges of Probate will no longer be permitted to practice in law for private clients, in addition to their official judicial duties. However, for the present it is permissible under the law. In fact, Judge Lomme estimates that as many as 80% of the Judges of Probate in the state represent private clients in addition to their judicial duties.

Middlesex Hospital Moves Ahead with Plans to Move Essex’s Shoreline Clinic to Westbrook

New Westbrook location of Clinic will be on road to Tanger Outlet Center

Middlesex Hospital is moving, full speed ahead, to move the present Shoreline Emergency Clinic in Essex to a new location just off I-95 in Westbrook. The move could take place as early as October 2013, according to the hospital’s Senior Vice President, Henry Evert.

Evert said of the present Essex facility, “We are totally out of space.” The new Westbrook location will be on Flat Rock Place, just down from the Tanger Outlets. It will be on the left hand side of the road, when approaching the shopping mall.  Presently, the site is just woods.

According to Evert a “purchase and sales” agreement has already been signed for the new 40,000 square foot site, which is double the size of the present Essex facility. The hospital’ senior vice president also said that Westbrook town authorities view the new development “very favorably,” and that there will be a meeting about the project at a Westbrook Planning and Zoning Commission on February 28.

Evert has also spoken before the Westbrook Chamber of Commerce about the new medical facility coming to Westbrook. He declined to say what the hospital paid for its new property, other than to say it was “a lot of money.”

The Shoreline Medical Center leaving Essex in 2013

Evert said that the new emergency clinic, off I-95 at Exit 65, “would provide better access to medical care for the shoreline communities.” He said that a picture of the new facility is not yet available. “We are still working on it,” he said.

He added that “as the population has grown in surrounding towns over the last 40 years, it made more sense to relocate the facility off I-95 to improve access to healthcare services for a rapidly increasing number of people in the shoreline area.”

North Cove Outfitters Going “Out of Business” After Almost a Quarter Century in Old Saybrook

No secret, North Cove Outfitters going out of business

North Cove Outfitters in Old Saybrook has been a landmark store on Main Street for hunters, fisherman and campers for nearly a quarter century. Now, it is closing its doors with one big final sale.

“I’m very sad, I will miss a lot of my friends,” said Kathy Fowler, who has worked at the store for 23 years. Closing the store she said “will be a big loss for the town, especially Main Street.”

However, in its final “going out of business” sale, the store is not exactly giving things away. In fact, on a recent visit it appeared that most items were a modest 10% off, or at most 30% off.  As one bargain hunter who was looking around noted, “Ten percent is nothing.”

"Ten percent is nothing," said one shopper

Store owner Norman Cavallaro, who owns the store with his partner, Edward Carney, was asked about the prevalence of sale items that were only 10% off. In response he promised that as the “going out business” sale progresses, prices will get lower and lower, “even as low as 50%.”

Sweaters for 30% to 50% off

Cavallaro said that one alternative to the extended “going out of business” sale, which could last as long as six to eight weeks, could have been to close the doors immediately, and sell all of the store’s merchandize “to a jobber.”

“But we did not want to go away in the middle of the night,” he said, “That is not the legacy that we want to leave. We did not want to do that,” Cavallaro said. We wanted “to try to keep employees on the store’s payroll as long as possible.”“It is not about me,” he said.

Lots of people looking for bargains

When asked which were the most popular items being sold at the “going out of business” sale, Cavallaro mentioned clothing and even some canoes. Also, the store has “always been selling a lot of firearms,” he said. The store’s extensive inventory includes, “guns, rifles, shot guns and pistols, and it has always been a strong line,” he noted.

North Cove Outfitters received many awards

Cavallaro also mentioned with pride the many awards that North Cove Outfitters had received over the years. He said the store was judged as the “Best Outdoor Store in the Country” by Backpacker Magazine. Also, it was considered the “Best Retailer of the Year” by Canoe & Kayak Magazine. In addition, the store received a “Recognition” plaque from the Old Saybrook Land Trust.

The store owner then brought up again the store’s employees, some forty of them in all, who will be losing their jobs because of the store’s closing. “I love their professionalism,” he said, noting the number of employees who have worked for many years at North Cove Outfitters, which is still located for awhile longer at 75 Main Street in Old Saybrook.

As for what has been the store’s secret of success over the years, Cavallaro had this to say, “As an owner you yourself don’t have to be smart, you just have to hire smart people.”

Old Saybrook First Selectman Carl Fortuna had this to say about the closing of North Cove Outfitters, “The residents of Old Saybrook are truly sorry to see North Cove Outfitters close its doors. The store has made a wonderfully iconic contribution to our community over more than two decades. Our town is now going to strive very hard to find a replace of equal quality.”

Eagles put on a Show at the River Museum’s “Eagle Watch Boat Tour” on the Connecticut River

Boat tour vessel, the 65 foot "Project Oceanology"

The eagles must have known we were coming! Soaring in the sky high above the decks of Project Oceanology’s 65 foot research vessel, was a solitary bald eagle, circling slowly, already in view. So began, on a recent Friday afternoon, another Connecticut River Museum “Eagle Watch Boat Tour,” pulling away from the museum’s Essex docks on the Connecticut River.

Soon after departure the passengers on board began to spot even more eagles. Some were in pairs and others were single eagles drifting lazily in the sky above. Later in the tour, there would be a final triumphal sighting on Nott Island of a female bald eagle, peeking out of her nest, patiently waiting for her eggs to hatch into baby eaglets.

This afternoon was made for eagle watching, with an unclouded sky, and unseasonably warm temperatures. However, once the vessel got underway, and out into the middle of the river, it was pretty chilly, notwithstanding the warmth on the land.

Passage ways are safe for passengers

39 paying passengers were on board for the tour, designed to spend an hour and a half in search of bald eagles. Even at a ticket cost of forty dollars per person, all those on board truly got their monies worth.

At the microphone the museum’s Naturalist and Educator Bill Yule was at first apologetic that there might be too few eagles to see during the tour. It had been such a warm winter, so perhaps the eagles might not have needed to fly south to find ice free, fishing waters. However, he had no need to apologize. There were plenty of bald eagles to be seen in the sky on this bright, bright day.

Bill Yule, master spotter of the eagles               

Bill Yule is the “Eagle Watch Boat Tour,” Master of Ceremonies. At times he is assisted by Project Oceanology’s Chris Dodge and Allyce Irwin, but Yule handles most of the speaking chores himself.

Boat Tour Moderator Bill Yule at the mike

Early on in the trip, Yule set out an eagle spotting system to help the passengers on board find the eagles in the sky. If an eagle were spotted dead ahead, off the bow of the boat, Yule would call this location “twelve o’clock.” If an eagle was spotted dead astern, it would be “six o’clock.”

Similarly, if an eagle was spotted mid ships at the right side of the vessel, it would be “three o’clock,” and mid ships on the left side of the ship, it would be “nine o’clock.” It was a simple system, but throughout the voyage, it helped guide the on-board eagle watchers to find their visual prey.

Although a few of the passengers needed only the naked eye to enjoy the sight of the eagles, most of the passengers made use of long range cameras, or powerful binoculars, to see the birds. Binoculars, incidentally, were provided at no extra charge to passengers.

DDT and the survival of the eagles

At about midpoint of the boat tour, Yule became very serious. He said that not too many years ago, “the eagles were almost gone from the river.” The reason was that that back in the 1950’s and 1960’s, DDT was widely used as a pesticide, and this pesticide in turn made its way into the waters of the Connecticut River.

The DDT was then ingested by the fish in the river, the very fish that was the staple of the eagle’s diet. DDT’s effect on the eagles turned out to be severe. It made the shells of the eggs of the female eagles too brittle to sheath properly embryonic baby eaglets. Unable to reproduce live birds, the eagle population declined rapidly, even to the point where eagles were put on the nation’s endangered species list.

However, in 1972 DDT was banned, and as a result no longer was DDT in the diet of the fish that the eagles consumed in the river. Able to reproduce again, the eagle population increased along the river; the shells of the mothers now strong enough to hold baby eaglets until their normal birth.

Ultimately, it reached the point where Bill Yule could say the other day, “The eagles have now come back to the river in abundance.”

“It is truly an environmental success story,” he said with a tone of triumph in his voice.

Also a bit of sightseeing on the boat tour

Yule occasionally diverted his attention from eagle spotting to becoming a Connecticut River tour guide.  “We are now passing Selden Island,” he said at one point. “It is the largest island in the State of Connecticut. There are four campsites on the island, and there is an old forge there as well.” He also told the stories of Joshua Rock, the Mount St. John School for Boys and the Gillette Castle.

While the eagle spotting by the passengers was still in full force, Yule mentioned a few eagle statistics. For one, they can fly as high as 12,000 feet in the sky. To reach these heights they take advantage of rising, warm air currents from the land. Also, according to Yule, eagles can fly at up to 50 miles an hour.

Continuing, Yule said that it is only after it reaches the age of four that an eagle’s tail turns white. Also, eagles are not particularly friendly to other birds, and they have been known to take fish out of the mouths of sea gulls.

In addition, eagles mate for life, although if one of the pair dies they quickly find a replacement. Also, a mother eagle sits on her eggs for 35 days before the eggs hatch, and while she is nesting, her mate brings fish for her to eat.

After they are born, the eagle mother will feed her young for several months, and ten weeks after birth the young eagles will learn to fly.  However, eagles are not genetically born to know how to fish, Yule said. It is a skill that they must learn on their own during their first year of life.

Since many young eagles cannot learn to fend for themselves, as many as 50 percent die in their first year of their lives, according to Yule.

The egg-laying season for eagles in the Essex area, this year is from February 2 to 23, Yule said. By June all of the eagles will be gone from our part of the river, having left for cooler waters up north.

                    Eagle watchers were well pleased with the tour

Among the passengers on this “Eagle Watch Boat Tour,” not a single one said they were disappointed with the tour.

Lee Bradley of Newington said, “I thoroughly enjoyed it,” and “the narration was very, very good.” For her part Sandy Clark of Manchester found the trip, “very interesting,” and “it was very good at showing us everything.” Lorraine Trinks of East Hartford simply called the boat tour, “fabulous.”

Close up of a Bald Eagle watcher

The Eagle Watch Boat Tours, sail only on Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays, and they began the 2012 season on February 3. The Friday boat tours will continue sailing until March 9, and the Saturday and Sunday boat tours, will continue sailing until March 10 and 11, respectively.

As for departure times, the Friday boat tours cast off from the museum’s docks at 1:00 p.m., and the Saturday and Sunday boat tours depart on both days at 9:00 a.m., 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m.

We shall give Bill Yule the final word on the Eagle Watch Boat Tour. As he puts it, “It is better than any other method to get up close and personal with our national symbol, the Bald Eagle.”

Bill Yule enjoying the ride home

 

Chaos Reigns, and the Ladies Love it, at Deep River Store on Main Street

The grand view of Chaos

Joann Hourigan refers to her store, Chaos, as “my therapy,” when she is talking about her truly unique enterprise at 114 Main Street in Deep River. Then, when asked why she named her store “Chaos,” she says, “Because that’s my life.”

In addition to owning Chaos, in real life so to speak, Hourigan is also Executive Director of the Deep River Housing Authority, where she has worked for 19 years. The Authority operates Kirtland Commons, which is a home for 31 elderly and disabled residents. “I love my residents and their families,” she says.  One of the residents is 102 years old.

Chaos owner Joanne Hourigan in mirror

“It’s social work,” is what she calls her work at the Commons, and it   gives her a lot of satisfaction to help people in need. At Chaos on the other hand it’s “another story.” “There, I have a chance to create, and that is what I really enjoy.”

Because of her schedule at the Commons, Hourigan frequently leaves running Chaos to Caroline Lemley, a 19 year old U-Conn sophomore. Hourigan calls Lemley, “My main girl.  She runs the place. People love her, and she is awesome at picking things out for customers.”

Chaos staffer Caroline Lemley

Regardless of who is in charge at a particular time, don’t think for a minute that the operation of Chaos is in any way “chaotic.” In fact, it is a tightly run and very successful enterprise, one that by offering an apparent jumble of goods, arouses a customer’s curiosity to find just the right thing; and then once found the customer buys it, even though they didn’t know they wanted it in the first place.

The floor space at Chaos is 300 square feet, allowing only a fifteen by twenty foot sales area. If the clutter of items was spread out in a normal manner, the floor space would have to be twice the size.

Above all, Hourigan wants Chaos to be “a fun place to come into.” “There are treasurers everywhere,” she says, “even stuff in birdcages.” “I love it that it is so packed in here,” she continues, “That is part of its charm.”

Looking about carefully cluttered Chaos, one sees practically every kind of feminine accessory known to man. “We are selling scarves, handbags and jewelry, and a lot of custom jewelry,” Hourigan says.

Crowded table top at Chaos

Also, partially open draws at Chaos bulge with cascades of objects, and every open space on tables are piled high with a profusion of necklaces, clasps, pins, bracelets and many other ornaments that intrigue and enhance the feminine taste.

Turnover is very quickly,” says Hourigan. Quick turnover means that even if a customer was in the store just a few days before, when she returns to the store a few days later, she can find new things to buy on her return visit.

The recent Christmas holiday was a boom at Chaos. “Christmas was fabulous,” says Hourigan. Racks of women’s clothing were sold, “and we even ran out of boots,” she says.

Chaos’ reasonable prices also encourage a quick turnover of goods for sale. At Chaos earrings cost $18, necklaces $20, and dresses and tops $28. Some of the necklaces sold at Chaos can be mistaken for heirlooms, according to at least one regular shopper at the store.

Bottle caps from Chaos

Also, when it’s warm enough, Chaos offers a running sequence of appealing sidewalk sales. One item of particular popularity is the “buck bowl.” Everything in the bowl costs a buck, i.e. a dollar, no matter what its original price.

When asked, how she selects the items that go into the “buck bowl,” Hourigan says, “I throw in things that I am tired of, or have only one left.” Fishing in the “buck bowl” is a very popular pastime for shopping anglers.

Store hours at Chaos are: Wednesday thru Saturday, 10:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. There are some stores in our area, when at times you cannot find what you are looking for. However, most of the time at Chaos, you’ll find it.

Connecticut River Museum has Spent $500,000 to Restore Historic Landmark After Fire

Destroyed East face, roof and decking of CT River Museum after August 2010 fire

The Connecticut River Museum, located at 67 Main Street in downtown Essex, had two choices in the wake of the devastating fire that took place on August 11, 2010, a fire which caused enormous damage to the Museum’s building, as well as to its decking.

One approach would have been to repair the damage, essentially, to the extent that the insurance money would cover the costs, and then hope for the best that other repairs, some very necessary, could be deferred until another day.

The second approach would address every single item that needed to be repaired, and in the process restore the museum not only to the condition of what it was before the fire, but perhaps even improve it from what it was. This full restoration plus choice, obviously, would cost a lot more money than the first, bare bones scenario.

The Board of Trustees of the Connecticut River Museum never blinked. They whole heartedly adopted the second alternative of fully repairing and restoring the Museum. In doing so, the Board chose to address every single item that required repair and the full restoration of the Museum.

Executive Director Jerry Roberts pridefully shows off restored Connectiuc River Museum

Furthermore, in adopting the full restoration plan the Board implicitly accepted the responsibility to raise the necessary money.

Board of Directors Chairman Maureen Wiltsie-O’Grady in a recent interview said, “The Museum had to be restored, because of the love that the community has for the Museum.” She added, “It is just a jewel. The fire made people think what Essex would be like without the Museum.”

Board Chairman Maureen Wilsie-O'Grady points to announcements at new Museum portal

These observations by the Chairman underscored the fact that the increased public attention and sympathy that was generated by the fire could be converted into a unique fundraising opportunity to pay for the level of restoration needed to ensure that the Museum would withstand the next 100 years.

With the stars thus aligned, the Museum Board, led by former Chairman Timothy Boyd, and the staff, led by the energetic Executive Director Jerry Roberts, went ahead and successfully raised the funds needed to repair the fire damage, and enhance generally the Museum’s building and grounds.

The fundraising steps included the establishment of the CMT Fire Fund for donations from Museum trustees, members and the public at large, as well as a successful effort to attract new government grants for the Museum’s restoration. Both these steps were in addition to achieving the Museum’s already established fundraising goals for the Annual Fund Appeal, Fall Ball, RIVERFARE and Privateers’ Bash.

These aggressive, and breathtakingly successful, fundraising steps has allowed the Museum, to date, to expend over a half million dollars, $565,500 to be exact, to repair and restore the Museum to a point where it is in even better condition than it was before the fire.

For example, with the funds raised the entire east face of the Museum building, which was destroyed by the fire, has been fully repaired and restored.

Similarly, large portions of the roof and the decking, which were destroyed by the fire, have been restored, as has the third floor gallery, which suffered water damage, and the Museum building, which experienced smoke damage.

Also included in this roster of fully paid for items was the installation of 29 new, energy efficient, museum-quality windows, as well as the installation of 70 new pilings under the decking of the Museum.

A further breakdown of the fully paid for repairs and restoration in the wake of the fire are as follows:

Building restoration and repair

This $300,000 item paid for by insurance monies and private donations, included a smoke and water clean-up; roof and siding repairs; window replacement of four fire destroyed windows and the upgrade of 25 other gallery windows; replacement of the building sign; repair of indoor mural; removal of carpets and restoration of the original wood flooring on the second and third floors.

Decking replacement and repair

This $185,000 item, which was funded from grants, donations and insurance, as well as funds from the Museum’s own historic building maintenance fund, provided money to replace the substructure pilings and decking surrounding the Museum building.

Grant funds for this project included $73,955 from the Connecticut Commission on Cultural and Tourism’s Historic Preservation Office.

Perimeter and Security/Grounds

In this category, $80,000 of private donations funded a new Museum perimeter security project, coupled with a grounds’ renovation plan. This initiative included new lights, a new portal at the entrance of the property, new walkways and the refurbishment of plantings. This project is now in its final stage of completion.

As for the new portal, according to Roberts, it will serve two purposes: 1) to establish a demarcation line between town property and Museum property, so that Museum property can be gated after hours, or whenever necessary, and 2) to provide information about Museum exhibits, programs and events.

The items regarding the perimeter and the security of the Museum property, obviously, go beyond simply repairing the Museum’s fire damages. Also, one of the items in this initiative has been objected to by a few Essex residents.

Specifically, the new portal structure, a few residents charge, takes away from the sense of openness of the Museum’s grounds that existed previously. Museum officials acknowledge that there have been a few objections to the portal structure; however, they assert that the objections are far from general, and that the upsides of the portal far outweigh the downsides, particularly from the standpoint of the Museum’s security.

Also, this very minor ruffle should in no way take away from the monumental achievement of the Museum’s Board and staff, who on their watch brilliantly restored the Connecticut River Museum to a condition that is even better than it was before the fire. In so doing they have preserved this historic asset for the edification and enjoyment of generations to come.

Commuters Howl About Paying for Parking at the Old Saybrook Railroad Station

Sign for $5 a day parking fee

“I think it is lousy,” said a rushing commuter about the new system of having to pay for parking at the Old Saybrook railroad station. She herself was avoiding paying, by parking for free out on North Main Street.

Another rushing commuter was Nancy Johnson of Old Saybrook. “I am sad about it. It’s awful,” she said about paying for parking at the railroad station. “What’s going to happen, when it snows? It’s going to get worse. People are going to get killed. There are no lights in the parking lot,” she pointed out.

Carolann McNeish of Old Saybrook also protested the new $5 a day parking fee at the station. “We need to encourage people to take the train,” she said. “This discourages them.”

McNeish said that she had called to complain about the new $5 fee for parking at the station. However, she was doubtful that it would do any good. As for her using the free parking area set aside for Shoreline East commuters, she said, “It’s always full.”

Even one of the new parking attendants, hired to collect the $5 fees, said, “A lot of people are complaining.”

What’s going on here? Well, it all began when David M. Adams, a partner of Saybrook Realty Partners, decided that it was time to charge for parking on the private property that his firm owns next to the railroad station. This property, called, Saybrook Junction, encompasses both the parking spaces at the shopping plaza, as well as those next to the railroad station.

To put the new “pay for parking” scheme into effect, Adams hired a large professional firm called LAZ Parking, and LAZ in turn hired two parking attendants to collect $5 a day parking fees from frequently puzzled parkers.

One parking attendant is on duty from 5:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., and the second, works from 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Since there is no on site booth for the attendants to sit in, they simply wander around the parking lot trying to get parkers to pay the $5 fee for parking, when appropriate. When the attendants get cold, they sit in their cars to warm up.

Not enough free parking spaces for commuters

In addition to putting into place a new “pay-to park” parking scheme, an attempt has also been made to provide free parking for train-bound passengers at two of the station’s “park-free” areas.

Shoreline East’s free parking area

One is an enclosed lot set aside for Shoreline East passengers, which faces North Main Street. On this lot there are 160 free parking spaces. However, the problem is that this Shoreline East lot is frequently full.

Also, there is a parking area reserved for Amtrak passengers. This area has 41 free spaces, and on busy days it too can be full.

Both of these free parking areas for train riders are well in the back of the Shoreline Junction’s parking spaces, so it is always something of a walk for Shoreline East and Amtrak passengers to get to the station.

Furthermore, Shoreline East and Amtrak riders are exempt from paying for parking, only when they are parking in their designated areas. Even if a person has a train ticket in hand, and shows it to the attendant, that is not good enough. They have to pay for parking.

The parking spaces closest to the new $6 million railroad station building are those which are reserved exclusively for the patrons of the “Pizza Works, pies and suds” restaurant. These “Pizza Works” parking spaces generally remain empty throughout the day.

Saybrook Junction, the private owner of rail station parking

Bob Kehayias of Pizza Works, while intent on preserving his restaurant’s privileged parking spaces, said in a recent interview that the solution to the parking problem at the railroad station is to build a new, freestanding parking garage, which would provide free parking for all.

Also, Kehayias said that at one time Amtrak owned the parking area next to the railroad station, but then sold them to a private owner, which he felt was very shortsighted. As for the present parking situation at Sayrbook Junction, he says, “Some people are upset and confused.”

Parking for free, away from the station

Still, some commuters have taken the new parking charges in stride. “It was a nice perk, while it lasted,” said one, referring to the days when parking at the station was free. When Pat Thompson of Essex on her way to the train was asked, if she was angry about having to pay for parking, she replied, “Not a bit.”

To end some of the confusion here is a summary of when “to pay, or not to pay” for parking on Saybrook Junction’s property at the Old Saybrook railroad station.

  1. Any person who is doing business with one of Saybrook Junction’s tenants, or who is an employee of one of its tenants, can park for free.
  2. Any person parking in the special area reserved for Shoreline East commuter parking can park for free, if of course they can find a space.
  3. Any person parking in the special spaces reserved for Amtrak passengers, which are indicated by painted yellow stripes, can park for free, if they can find an empty space.
  4. Any person parking in the One Hour Parking row at Saybrook Junction can park for free for one hour.
  5. Any person parking outside the Saybrook Junction parking lot, such as along the side of North Main Street, can park for free.
  6. Any handicapped person can park for free in handicapped spaces at the Saybrook Junction parking lot at the station. However, the handicapped parking spaces in the Pizza Works restaurant area require eating at the restaurant at the time of their use.
  7. Any person that parks in Saybrook Junction’s  parking spaces, which do not fit one of the above “park free” categories, must pay $5 a day for parking. Furthermore, if a person, who is required to pay, wants to park for more than one day, they must pay in advance for the multiple days and display their daily receipts, so they can be seen by the attendants.
  8. As a general rule those persons parking in spaces that are bordered by white stripes are required to pay the $5 a day parking fee.

David Adams, the partner-owner of the Saybrook Junction, said in a recent interview that by instituting charges for parking on their parking lot, “We wanted to get the situation under control and to alleviate the pressure.” Asked about what he felt about those people who are not paying for parking, when they should be, he said, “If there is a ten percent slippage, so what.”

Even with the slippage it appears that charging for parking on   Saybrook Junction’s property at the railroad station is making money. “It’s profitable,” is the way Adams puts it.

Republican Carl Fortuna Elected First Selectman

A happy man, winning Old Saybrook First Selectman, Carl Fortuna

Republican candidate Carl Fortuna was elected first selectman Tuesday, defeating Democrat nominee Carol Manning by 954 votes. The result was 2,084 votes for Fortuna to 1,130 votes for Manning.

Fortuna’s Republican running-mate, Scott Giegerich, was elected to the board with 2,012 votes. Democrat Steven Gernhardt was also  elected to the board with 1,159 votes.

In a victory statement the newly elected Old Saybrook First Selectman, Carl Fortuna, said at his campaign headquarters in Old Saybrook, “I am thrilled to be elected, and I look forward to doing great things for the town of Old Saybrook.”

The losing candidate, Carol Manning was far more subdued. In fact there were supporters with tears in their eyes at her headquarters. Manning said simply, “I’ll be around. I’ll be around.”

There is always a next time, losing First Selectman candidate, Carol Manning


In a nice touch Fortuna walked down Boston Post Road to Manning’s nearby headquarters to extend his greeting to Manning, not that it helped much.

Big Voter Turnout in Old Saybrook, Fortuna and Manning Lead Their Tickets

A day so beautiful it seemed like spring resulted in a record number of voters coming out to vote today in Old Saybrook.  Democratic candidate for First Selectman Carol Manning said in a poll side comment outside of the Old Saybrook High School, “I am very hopeful with the support that we are receiving, and I want to thank all the voters for their turning out to vote.”

Democratic candidates: Hank Conti for Board of Finance; Carol Manning for First Selectman and Julien Brookson for Board of Appraisals and Appeals

For his part Republican candidate for First Selectman Carl Fortuna said outside the polls at the Old Saybrook Middle School, “We’ve worked hard, going door to door, and we have had great enthusiasm among the volunteers. And Scott and I are optimistic of our being the First and Second Selectman.” “Scott” refers to Scott Giegerich, who is running for Selectman on Fortuna’s ticket.

Carl Fortuna, Republican candidate for First Selectman

At both polling places, the High School and the Middle School, there were a profusion of campaign signs. Also, facing off at the polls were Thomas Stevenson, Republican candidate for the Board of Finance, and John Duhig, his Democratic opponent for a place on the Board of Finance. Duhig is a native of Ireland, who is now very much an American citizen.

Thomas Stevenson, Republican for Board of Finance, and John Dulig, Democrat for Board of Finance

Frostbite Sailors Brave the Wind and Cold, “all for the love of sailing”

Snow on boats before launching (Photo courtesy of Bob Leary)

In a bright, bright sun, on a cold, cold day, with the wind gusting well over 20 knots, twenty-five hearty sailors raced last Sunday (Oct. 30) for the better part of an afternoon in Essex Harbor.

These Frostbiters, as they call themselves, didn’t seem to mind conditions such as these. For them the more blustery it is, the better. In fact, when it was learned that ten “frostbiting” sailboats had capsized while sailing this afternoon, it was taken as a point of pride, rather than  a demonstration of what some might consider pure foolishness.

Readying the boats in parking lot

There were four kinds of boats in the afternoon’s competition in the cold.  They were: (1) the graceful, 30 foot Etchells, (2) the JY-15’s, (3) the Ideal 18’s, and (4) the one person, single sail Lasers of 13 feet, 9 inches. Most of the boats that capsized during the afternoon races were Lasers, with a few JY-15’s as well.

Single-handed Lasers round a mark

Once a Laser capsizes there is only one person at hand, who can bring the boat back upright, and that is the one man crew. Regular dunking into the water is the primary reason why Laser skippers wear full-bodied wet suits. The wet suit, however, does not keep a capsized sailor’s head from getting wet, and there is always a bit of water leaking down into the wet suit, after the boat and sailor have gone into the drink.

Crew struggles with capsized boat in water (Photo courtesy of Bob Leary)

A Crash Boat, fully motorized, patrols the Frostbite races, manned by  Frostbite Yacht Club Commodore, Scott Baker. If Baker sees that a capsized Laser sailor is having a difficult time righting his vessel, he has the power to send the boat back to the dock, because of the sailor’s evident fatigue. “If they are having trouble, we send them back in,” Baker says.

On this afternoon the Commodore sent three exhausted Laser skippers back to the dock, because of fatigue. In fact, there was such a concern for capsizing Lasers that the crash boat began following them around their course.

The larger Etchells can suffer a variety of breakdowns, such a broken spinnaker pole or traveler, but they are rarely, if ever, ordered back to dock, because of skipper’s fatigue.

As for Sunday’s sailing competition, the Frostbite sailors spoke with real feeling. “It was an awesome, windy day,” said Toby Doyle, who took first place with his Etchells in the afternoon’s races. “We survived,” he added.

An Etchells close-hauled

Other winning skippers were Mathew Wilson, first place of the JY-15’s; Ed Birch, captain of the winning Ideal 18, who is frequently a winning skipper; and Chris Field, the first place Laser skipper, who had only himself to thank for his victory.

As for the weather conditions, Ed Birch said, “It was nasty out there, with big puffs coming up.” A one point Birch said, “We were getting killed out there.”

An Etchells with full spinnaker

For her part Charlotte Posey, who sails an Ideal 18 with her husband, Dennis Posey, she was shocked when her husband said he wanted to go sailing today. They first had to shovel the snow out of their driveway.

The Ideal 18 requires a crew of two, and Charlotte Posey says that she and her husband “are one of the few couples out there who can sail together.”

After the races a former Commodore of the Frostbiters, Rick Harrison, said simply while sipping some hot soup, “It was a day of survival.”

Frostbnite Commodore Scott Baker eating soup after the race

The ultimate arbiter, whenever there is a dispute, is the club’s   Principal Race Officer, Tom Carse. As for the winds this day he termed them, “Very difficult, very puffy.”

Commodore Baker officially termed the day’s weather conditions as, “challenging but not dangerous.” Do the Frostbiters sometimes sail in  “dangerous conditions?” The Commodore answered, “Yes.”

Of the 25 sailboats boats in the races, there were four Etchells, four JY-15’s, 8 Ideals 18’s, and 9 Lasers. After all the boats were pulled out of the water, and stored until next week’s race, beginning at 1:00 p.m. Sunday, November 6th, in Essex Harbor, the Frostbiters retired to a local yacht club and some hot soup. Sailing a boat is always a matter of moods, it seems. This past Sunday was one of just pure excitement.

Frostbiters' Race Committee Boat

Pettipaug Yacht Club Still Showing Effects of Irene

Debris taken out of the water by club members

Hurricane Irene visited the Pettipaug Yacht Club in a big way on Sunday, August 28, and the club is still feeling the after effects. For one there is literally a parade of floating logs coming down the river, and clogging up with debris the club’s boat ramp to the river.

“We have to clear the boat ramp at least every two days,” says Paul Risseeuw, who is the Director of the club’s Sailing Academy and informal caretaker of the club.  A pile of the debris that has been collected by club members is kept next to the boat ramp. The sizes of some of the pieces taken out of the river by club members are impressive.

However, as Risseeuw admits, some of the whole trees that pull up at the club’s docks are simply too big to handle, Reluctantly, they have to be pushed back into the river to continue their journey towards the sound.

Paul Risseeuw points high water mark at club

When the Irene’s storm water reached its highest, it was up to the second step from the top of the stairs at the club house. The club house itself is on a platform some four feet above the ground, and no water touched the deck.  However, all the grounds of the club were completely submerged during the storm period.

When the water on the grounds reached a certain point although anchored in some fashion, the boats began to float. (All of the boat’s masts and been removed before the storm.) This meant that some 120 boats were floating around during flood periods. The boats afloat included: Blue Jays, 420s, Lasers, as well as several Boston Whalers.

Although anchored to the ground, because of the leeway in their painters, the floating boats began to sway, and a number of them banged into each other. A few boats were damaged in this fashion. Also, a storage shed, where wind surfers had been kept, was badly banged out by wind, water and swinging boats.

However, saved from banging boats on the flooded grounds, were the small Optimist sailboats. They had been stacked on the floor of the clubhouse and were unharmed.

The story was very different for one boat owner at the club, who decided to keep his boat in the water in spite of Irene. It was a big mistake. Early in the storm the boat was flipped over to its side, and a floating tree coming down the river dragged the capsized boat and mooring down the river, and eventually hung up on another mooring. The owner found his boat after a hunt only to learn that the boat’s mast had been broken into three pieces. The boat owner had to hire a floating crane to get his boat out of the water.

Some club grounds still a jumble

Meanwhile the club’s docks completely avoided any damage, although the poles that are driven into the river bottom to hold the docks in place now appear bent. If the poles themselves had failed, it would have meant the loss of the club’s docks.

With the exception of the single boat left in the water, and the only minor damage caused by the boats anchored on the club grounds banging around, the club got away pretty easily from the visit by Irene. As Risseeuw puts it bluntly, “We got away cheap.”

A second chapter to Irene

There was also a week or so later, a second chapter to Irene. Some are calling it, the “Vermont mud slide.” Because of the heavy rains during Irene, the Vermont shore of the Connecticut River, way up north, flushed an enormous amount of sediment, i.e. mud, into the river.

In fact, there was so much Vermont mud coming down the river, the waters out in front of the club turned brown for a number of days.

Also, according to Risseeuw, there was a layer of Vermont mud dumped on the grounds of Pettipaug. There was also a second surge of high water, but nothing on the scale of Irene.

With its grounds scarcely above high tide levels, it is inevitable that future hurricanes will again completely flood the grounds of the Pettipaug Yacht Club.

Entrance sign of the Pettipaug Yacht Club

Risseeuw says that before another hurricane hits, which is inevitable, the club has decided to order all boats off the club grounds, and moved to higher elevations. Whether that means storing them in private driveways, or even in well elevated marinas, it won’t make any difference. “The boats are not going be allowed to be left here,” Risseeuw says.

Also, there will be strict rule that all boats, when a hurricane threatens, must be hauled out of the water, no exceptions. Some sailors simply have to be saved from themselves.

 

Carl Fortuna Seeks to Fill the Shoes of Michael Pace as Old Saybrook’s First Selectman

Fortuna at Founders Park, built by First Selectman Michael Pace

Carl Fortuna exudes confidence. He is confident that he has served Old Saybrook well over the past 10 years as a Member and Chairman of the Board of Finance. He is confident that he has put together a strong campaign to become the town’s First Selectman, and he is optimistic about his chances on Election Day, November 8.

Over the past twelve years Republican Michael Pace has governed Old Saybrook as First Selectman. During this period Pace compiled an unprecedented record of rebuilding the physical face of the town. These improvements include: the historic building of the Katherine Hepburn Theater, the construction of the new Town Hall, the construction a new town recreation building, the renovation of the town’s fire house, and, perhaps most notable of all, the completely new look of the Main Street of Old Saybrook.

Candidate Fortuna helps getting the lawn signs ready

The man with the town checkbook, behind this raft of improvements, has been Carl Fortuna, who for ten years has served under Pace as both a Member and then Chairman of the town’s all important Board of Finance. Now Fortuna is running to succeed Mike Pace.

Fortuna maintains that Pace’s building spree has not created an impossible fiscal burden for the town. In fact, he says that the town’s current “debt level is very manageable.” However, Fortuna acknowledges that any bond issues in the future will have to be carefully tuned”

By way of background Fortuna, in addition to his Board of Finance duties, is a practicing attorney with an office in Middletown. When asked at a recent public appearance how he would manage being a practicing attorney and the town’s First Selectman at the same time, his response was that, if elected, he would be “a full time First Selectman.”

In fact, he points out that the Town Charter specifies that the First Selectman’s job is to be a full time position. However, Fortuna has said that on a limited basis he would consider representing private clients so long as it does not interfere with his First Selectman’s obligations. “I have two partners in Middletown that will handle my caseload,” he says.

Republican headquarter on Boston Post Road, Old Saybrook

Illustrative of the fact that Fortuna is capable of engaging in the business of the town, while at the same time practicing law, is the very active role that he has played on the town’s Board of Finance for the past ten years. Having been at the financial heart of town government for many years, also lends credence to Fortuna’s assertion that when he assumes the job of First Selectman, “I can hit the ground running.”

There will be a very short time to learn the ropes for those who are newly entering town government. After the election on November 8, fourteen days later, on November 22, these newcomers will take the offices that they were elected to serve.

As Chairman of the seven member Board of Finance, Fortuna has been primarily responsible for review of the town budget, a task which Fortuna says is “a laborious process.” It is wide ranging as well. In fact, the Board of Finance is already considering issues for future budgets of 2012 and 2013.

In coming up with town budgets the Board of Finance may, in any given year, hold as many as 15 meetings and three public hearings on the budget.

The climax of the budgetary process is when the Board of Finance seeks the approval of the budget by residents of the town. The first step in the process is a hearing to solicit comments from town residents on the town’s next year’s budget. After this public hearing the new town budget is put before a referendum of town voters.

Fortuna notes that during his period of service on the Board of Finance not a single town budget has been turned down by the voters in referendum. “It shows that we have done our job correctly,” he says.

To assist in public understanding of the budget in advance of its life or death referendum, Fortuna has held workshops on the budget for those interested. If elected First Selectman he says that all meetings on town budgets and other issues will be held in the evening, when the public can more easily attend.

Fortuna confers with Cal Calderella, Republican Town Chairman

 Major policy questions facing Old Saybrook

According to Fortuna there are two major policy areas that must be addressed in managing the Town of Old Saybrook in the future: 1) fiscal questions, especially those relating to real property taxes in the town and 2) preserving the quality of life of the town.

In the fiscal area, the major issues are fourfold. The first is the falling  real property values in town. In fact, the next revaluation may show property values in Old Saybrook have declined by over 20 percent. This means that fewer property tax dollars will be paid to the town without a mil rate rise.

Second, there will, very likely, be a decrease in state aid to the town this year as well, concomitant with the changing of the state aid formula for education. Also, the fact that the state characterizes Old Saybrook as a wealthier town means the town gets less state aid dollars than other towns. It all comes down to, as Fortuna put it, “We are going to get less.”

The third major issue with fiscal implications facing the Town of Old Saybrook in Fortuna’s view is the town’s innovative waste water management program. The town created its Water Pollution Control Authority to deal with this issue.

Faced with a lawsuit and a court order, Old Saybrook was required to develop a plan for sewerage treatment. “This has been the defining town issue over the past fifteen years,” says Fortuna, “and it will continue to be one for the next ten years.”

What the town has come up with so far is a decentralized sewerage treatment program, which will be first of its kind in the state.

Rather than having one large, town sewerage treatment plant, Old Saybrook plans to rely on individual homeowners to put in place their own upgraded septic systems, pursuant to precise specifications and subject to regular inspection. As Fortuna points out, the plan could turn out to be “a very costly project” for the town and therefore will require good management.

The fourth issue on the candidate’s list of major issues is that the town is going to have to build, and pay for, a new Police Department headquarters. The department’s old Main Street headquarters is completely “unsustainable for operations,” according to a recent report by the Town’s structural engineer.

Under the category of a quality of life issue in Fortuna’s mind is the attempt to develop the Preserve. The “so-called” Preserve is a 1,000 acre tract of privately owned land, heavily forested, and mostly located within the boundaries of Old Saybrook.

The Town’s Planning Commission not too long ago approved a proposed development on the property. The approvals have been challenged in court, but Fortuna fears that the Commission’s approvals will ultimately be upheld.

Fortuna feels strongly that, “Building on that land [the Preserve] would be bad fiscally and environmentally for the Town of Old Saybrook. These are the last 1,000 acres of the coastal forest in the State,” he notes.

Also, he feels, “To develop the property will place a financial burden on the town,” because of “the infrastructure requirements” that would be “onerous to the town.” “I think we need to cause a ruckus to oppose this development,” Fortuna says. “We need to make it a statewide, even national cause.”

Fortuna’s running mate, Scott Giegerich

As for the background of Scott Giegerich, he is the Principal of the Middle School in Portland and the Associate Principal of the town’s Secondary School as well. He and his wife, Joanne, have educated all of their three children in Old Saybrook public schools, and Joanne Giegerich is a teacher in the Old Saybrook school system.

So far Fortuna and his running mate for Selectman post, Scott Giegerich, have sent out five campaign mailings.

On the subject of education, Fortuna notes in a campaign flyer that the Board of Finance under his leadership has fully funded with fiscally responsible budgets the following projects:

Renovation of the high school and middle school; New watering system on the high school fields; Improvement of the day to day maintenance; and  Resealing of the high school track and tennis courts.

Also, in an advertisement the campaign claims that “The Fortuna-Giegerich Team” stands for: Protecting our town’s finances; Continuing educational excellence; Dealing with economic challenges; Respecting the environment, and Transparency in government.

Another campaign piece is headlined, “Life is Good in Old Saybrook.” Among the factors listed: “Over the past 10 years as chairman of the Board of Finance Carl Fortuna has provided the steady leadership that makes Old Saybrook a great and affordable place to live.” The piece continues, “The mill rate has remained low, while fully funding the Town’s service needs in Education, Public Safety and Public Works.”

Also noted is that, “Over the last 10 years Old Saybrook has: Enacted firefighter tax abatements; Enacted the elderly circuit breaker helping our seniors stay in their homes; Maintained a stable rainy day fund; and Improved the Town’s bond rating.”

The piece ends with the campaign’s mantra,

Let’s keep it that way.” 

 

Democrats Manning and Gernhardt in Uphill Fight Against 12 Years of Republican Rule

Candidate Manning at the head of Main Street

It is not going to be an easy win for the Democrats. The Republicans, under the leadership of First Selectman Michael Pace, have ruled Old Saybrook with a firm hand for the past 12 years. However, Pace is now retiring at the end of the year and moving to Florida. In doing so he leaves wide open the post of First Selectman.

Carol Manning is the Democratic candidate running to fill Pace’s shoes as Old Saybrook’s First Selectman. Manning states the obvious when she says that “Pace is not the candidate” in the November election.

However, the fact is Pace’s record, the new buildings he build, the  town hall staff he employed, what he has done and has not done while in office, will all have to be dealt as the town moves forward. This can only mean that there could be big changes ahead for this town of over 10,000 people, who live where the Connecticut River meets Long Island Sound.

What Pace has left behind in Old Saybrook is in effect the “elephant in the room,” which demands to be noticed in the current campaign. No matter which party wins the next election, the new administration will have to deal with the many, many acts of government, good and some not so good, that Pace has left behind as his legacy.

However, before she gets down to addressing the issues of governing  in a post-Pace era, Democratic candidate Carol Manning takes issue with the fact that she is running for an office, whose name does not match her gender. First Selectman she grants is the “legal title” of the position that she is running for, but she prefers to use the name “First Selectwoman,” if you please. “I want to set myself away from one of the boys,” is the way she puts it.

Manning by the way has already been serving as Selectman of Old Saybrook. So she has had to live with a title that also does not fit her gender for some time now.

Manning is careful to point out that if elected, she would not be the first woman in the town’s history to hold the position of First Selectman. In fact, Barbara Maynard, a Republican, held the post of First Selectman of Old Saybrook for 16 years back in the 70’s and 80’s.

Maynard, who still lives in town, was asked recently, whether or not she was going to endorse a candidate for First Selectman in the current campaign. She said, firmly, “no,” giving as her reason the many non-partisan, civic activities she is now engaged in. However, Maynard did go out of her way to praise Carol Manning, saying that the Democratic candidate “a very competent and capable person.”

Feminism not an issue

In the current campaign Manning maintains that “Feminism is not an issue.” “What this race is about,” she says is, “is what is best for Old Saybrook and its people.”

The first plank in her platform, she said in a recent interview, is that “I want to make government more open and transparent.” Referring back to how Pace ran things, she grouses, “There has been a lack of respect for the people, when Selectman’s meetings are held as early at 10:00 a.m.”

On the same theme Manning charges that, “On occasion there have not been public agendas in advance of public meetings.”  She would see that they are. Also, she would require Selectman meetings to be audio taped, and that these tapes be made available to the public.

In addition, she feels that the meetings of the town’s Board of Finance should be audio taped, and that the tapes be made available to the public as well.

In addition to her emphasis on transparency, Manning has a checklist of proposals to improve Old Saybrook’s governance. For one, she feels that the very important Department of Public Works should have a new citizen’s advisory board to monitor its activities. All other town departments have such citizen oversight committees or commissions she says.

First Selectman Candidate Manning at Town Dock

While on the subject of the Department of Public Works, candidate Manning has a “honey do-like” roster of projects that should be addressed. They include fixing a number of town roads and sidewalks that need repaving. Also, she notes that the path to the town dock on the Connecticut River at Ferry Road is frequently flooded; which she says is unfair to the fishermen and boaters who use the dock.

She also finds fault that “most of the windows” of the town’s Goodwin Elementary School need repair, and that a portion of the roof of the town’s Middle School is in need of repair as well.

Then, there is the long running issue as to what should be the town’s policy should be towards the Preserve. Even though this 1,000 acre tract of open land is in the hands of private owners, Manning says, “I believe the Preserve should be preserved for the town.” It should be our “Central Park.”

Manning on the issues

Manning has put together several handouts that give her positions on town issues. One carries the headline,

Let’s make it a new day in Old Saybrook!

Her “basic pledge to Old Saybrook voters,” is the theme of one of her handouts. If elected, she pledges that she would: “Enhance fiscal responsibility AND accountability; Provide good government services from fair taxes; Lead a government that respects and listens to voters; Support quality education for our public schools; and Protect the environment and our quality of life.”

She also allows that her on-the-job experience as Selectman of the town has given her: “Firsthand knowledge of important issues facing Old Saybrook taxpayers; Proven record of listening to residents and acting in their interest; and Frequent participation at board/commission meetings, especially Finance.”

Also, she proudly points out that in her service as Selectman she has: “Helped residents maintain Youth and Family Services; Informed qualified homeowners about Small Cities Grants; Worked with the Old Saybrook Historical Society on the 375th Anniversary; Arranged free/low cost educational sails for Old Saybrook youth; Served on Board of Education Strategic Action Committee; Supported affordable housing on Ferry Road; and Promoted energy conservation changes for senior housing.”

Manning also asserts that she has established and maintained relationships with elected officials at the state level during her service as Selectman to the benefit of the town.

As for Manning’s personal background, she was for 34 years a high school teacher and department head at a public high school in Bellingham, Massachusetts, where she taught biology and chemistry. She is also a “cum laude” graduate of Rhode Island College, and she holds a Master’s degree from the University of Massachusetts. She moved to Old Saybrook in 2004.

Steven Gernhardt, Democrat for Selectman

Manning’s running mate for Selectman, Steven Gernhardt, is a life-long resident of Old Saybrook. He and his wife, Diana, have six year old twins, who attend the Katherine E. Goodwin Elementary School.

Candidates at Goodwin Elementary School

Like his running mate, Gernhardt feels that the most important issue facing Old Saybrook is to create “a transparent government.”

Gernhardt also has an employment situation, which, sadly, is not atypical in these troubled times. After 16 years working as a bio-analytical chemist at Pfizer in New London, Gernhardt summarily lost his job.

For the time being, he has rejected the idea of traveling all over the country “to chase a job.” Instead he has made the choice of “taking more time with the kids.”

Gernhardt is also determined never to leave the town that he was born in, Old Saybrook. Someday, he says he might explore becoming a chemistry teacher. Fortunately, his wife is still working at Pfizer as a clinician in oncology, and Genhardt has some severance pay to drawn down as well.

“He is a good man,” says Manning, enthusiastically, about her running mate, Steven Gernhardt.

Middlesex Hospital Opens New Primary Care Office in Old Saybrook

Primary Care offices at 154 Main Street, Old Saybrook

Main Street in Old Saybrook has a new addition. It is the recently completed and fully finished Middlesex Hospital Primary Care office, located at 154 Main Street. There is ample parking behind the new office.

The new Old Saybrook office is part of Middlesex Hospital’s primary care network, and the hospital has similar offices in Chester, Essex, Westbrook and Madison.

Physicians practicing at the new office in Old Saybrook include, Adam Perrin, M.D. Perrin is a board-certified Family Medicine and Sports Medicine practitioner, and he has a special interest in treating patients with asthma, and in alternative medicine techniques.

The Primary Care givers on Main Street: (l to r) Lucinda L. Hautaniemi, M.D.; Adam E. Perrin, M.D.; and Lauryn Slomkowski, A.P.R.N.

Also, practicing at the new Old Saybrook office is Lucinda Hautaniemi, M.D., who is board-certified in Family Medicine. She has a special interest in asthma, as well adolescent, pediatric, women’s health and geriatrics care.

Arthur McDowell, III, M.D., Vice President, Clinical; Affairs, Middlesex Hospital, said in connection with the opening of the new primary care office in Old Saybrook, “Our primary care doctors in Old Saybrook, as in other locations, are caring and compassionate healthcare providers, who take great pride in establishing special connections with their patients.

“Often they are the cornerstone of care for patients, who are seeking specialists, coordinating services, and monitoring chronic diseases. Generally, our primary care physicians can offer a lifetime of care for their patients,” he said.

Appointments at the new Middlesex Hospital Primary Care offices in Old Saybrook can be made by calling 860-395-1212, or dropping the offices at 154 Main Street. Also, Middlesex Hospital publishes an electronic newsletter, which provides the latest information about its services at www.middlesexhospital.org

Shoreline Medical Center Plans to Move out of Essex

The Shoreline Medical Center, presently located in Essex at 260 Westbrook Road, is planning to move out of town.  Sites in Old Saybrook, just off I-95 at Exit 66, and Westbrook, off I-95 at Exit 65, are among those that have been considered.

One of the candidate sites in Old Saybrook has already been rejected because of ground water problems, according to a spokesperson at Middlesex Hospital.

Middlesex Hospital owns and operates the Essex-based Shoreline Medical Center, which offers emergency services, 24-hours a day, seven days a week, as well as radiology services, including open and closed MRI, high speed CAT scans and mammography, plus a variety of neurology services.

The reason that Middlesex Hospital wants to move the Shoreline Medical Center is, “Currently, the facility’s size and land simply does not offer adequate space to meet our needs,” says Harry Evert, Vice President of Operations for Middlesex Hospital.  He adds, “Middlesex Hospital’s Shoreline Medical Center was established more than 40 years ago, at the urging of local residents in southern Middlesex County, to have closer access to medical care.”

Evert explains, “In order to continue the tradition of providing close access to medical care, the hospital is investigating possible locations to relocate that would provide the easiest access to the largest number of patients throughout the shoreline communities, and allow for expansion of services and new technology,” concluding, “We are currently in the process of searching for a location that would best meet those criteria.”

The present Essex facility, according the Middlesex Hospital’s web site, “Offers quality health care services provided by skilled, caring medical professionals to the over 80,000 community residents we serve.”

Ambulance Service at Shoreline Clinic, Essex

A major factor in driving the move out the Essex, according to Middlesex Hospital sources who wished to remain anonymous, is also that Yale-New Haven Hospital’s new Shoreline Medical Center in Guilford, located just off I-95, has proved to be very successful.  It is believed to be the kind of success that Middlesex Hospital would like to emulate with a new facility close to I-95 as well.The Yale-New Haven Shoreline Medical Center in Guilford offers 24 hours a day, seven days a week emergency services, as well as a blood drawing station, nuclear medicine, a nutrition center, a surgery center and a cancer center, among other specialties.

Random interviews with those going in and out of the present Essex Shoreline Medical Center did not appear to be overly exercised about moving the facility.  Old Saybrook resident Liz Yavrone, who was waiting outside for her daughter, however, did grouse that the present Essex facility was, “Always busy,” and that she, “Never had less than a three hour wait to see a doctor.”

Chester resident Bob Farrar said that going to a new facility in Old Saybrook, if that were the chosen location, “Would be just as handy” for him, as the present Essex location.  “It’s only 10 minutes more,” said an Essex resident, who declined to give her name.

The present Essex-based Shoreline Medical Center has, according to the web site, “Received for the past three years the prestigious Press Ganey Summit Award for three consecutive years of over 95% satisfaction – the only emergency department in Connecticut to be recognized for this achievement.”

The Ever Full Parking Lot

Senator Daily Announces $75,000 Grant for Gillette Castle Upgrades

Gillette Castle State Park, East Haddam, CT. (Photo courtesy of CT DEP)

Senator Eileen Daily, whose district covers Essex, Deep River, Chester and parts of Old Saybrook, has announced a $75,000 state grant to one of the area’s major tourist attractions, Gillette Castle State Park. The grant, which was approved by the State Bond Commission, will fund an  initial phase of terrace and stone wall repairs at the park.

Daily said, “The Gillette Castle State Park is one of the crown jewels of the Connecticut River valley and rightfully attracts some 300,000 visitors per year.” She continued, “The eccentricities of the building and grounds are matched only by the panoramic views from the castle itself and from throughout the 180-plus acre grounds – they are memorable for local residents and tourists alike.”

Daily also said that she played “an instrumental role in the four-year $11 million restoration of the park,” which has been on the National Register of Historic Places since 1986. “I’m grateful to Governor Malloy and the members of the bond commission for their favorable consideration of this project and this investment in our local economy,” Daily said.

Courtney joins bi-partisan majority in voting “yes” on compromise debt legislation

Eastern Connecticut Congressman Joe Courtney was one of 95 Democrats who voted in favor of a bi-partisan “compromise debt agreement,” which passed in the House of Representatives on August 1. Joining Courtney in voting for the compromise bill was Democratic Representative Gabrielle Giffords, who returned to the House for the first time, since she was severely wounded by a  gunman in Arizona on January 8.

Also, 174 Republicans voted for the bill, while 95 Democrats and 66 Republicans voted against it. The final tally was 269 votes in favor, and 161 against the measure.

In a statement following the vote Courtney said, “With just hours to spare before the United States would default,” the bill is “the only viable path to avoiding economic catastrophe.”

Courtney, who last Saturday voted for a debt bill sponsored by Senator Majority Leader Harry Reid, stressed that like the Reid bill, “the compromise protects seniors by prohibiting automatic cuts to Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare beneficiaries”
Courtney also said that the legislation “provides long-term peace of mind to families and financial markets by ensuring that we are not engaged in this divisive, unnecessary debate just six months from now.”

However, the Congressman admitted, “This plan is far from perfect, but it succeeds on some critical fronts,” noting that it “locks down a significant payment toward deficit reduction, while also establishing a bipartisan process to address larger savings and tax reform in the future, including waste at the Pentagon.”

The Congressman, whose district includes the Connecticut River towns of Old Saybrook, Essex, Deep River, Chester, Lyme and Old Lyme concluded, “With this long process finally over, Congress must focus its attention where the American people have wanted it all along: on job creation and protecting our fragile economic recovery.”

Time for a Spring Touch up at Stop and Shop

Some cars stop, some do not

It has been a tough winter for the Stop & Shop shopping plaza in Old Saybrook, and it shows.  On entering the plaza, the first thing you are supposed to see is a bright red, stop sign. The trouble is that the sign is only faintly red and is now basically colorless.

A modest sign

In a recent, very informal, test, even though the stop sign is faded, most drivers, perhaps out of habit, courteously and safely stopped. However, some did not, and drove right through without stopping.

Behind the faded stop sign is a store called “Sheer Madness.” Must we say that it is “Sheer Madness” that drivers can barely read the stop sign, when they go to Stop & Shop?

Next thing in need of a spring touch up are the two pedestrian walkways that access pedestrian traffic to and from the parking lots. Both crosswalks are so faded, and in such a need of paint, that there is hardly a semblance of what they once were suppose to indicate.

Paint faded walkway

Well defined and painted pedestrian walkways are particularly necessary for handicapped shoppers, who shop at Stop & Shop. Non-handicap shoppers are better able to make a run for it, when non-stopping vehicles ignore the totally vanished walkways.

In fairness there are signs beside the barren walkways that say “Stop for Pedestrians in Crosswalks.” The type is somewhat small, and the signs are a bit out of kilter, but at least they are there. However, bright, white pedestrian crosswalks, for in and out store traffic, should be a first priority for a spring touch up.

Finally, there are the washed out “fire lanes” in front of the store, which the firefighters would not like. They too need a white paint touch up.

Spring is here, Shop & Stop, and some touch-ups are very necessary.   

Once a "Fire Lane"

Democrat Courtney decries “a disconnect” with Republicans in Congress

Publisher of OldSaybrookNow.com, Olwen Logan greets Congressman Joe Courtney at Essex Library.

Congressman Joe Courtney (2nd CD – CT) decried what he termed “a disconnect” between Republicans and Democrats in Congress, since the Republicans took control of the House of Representatives in the last election. Courtney made the observation in an exclusive interview with ValleyNewsNow.com at the Essex Library on March 6.

Courtney cited as an example of this disconnect, the widely divergent views on President Obama’s proposal to build a national high speed rail network. “There is such a chasm between the two sides on this issue,” he said. Courtney is a strong advocate of the President’s high speed rail proposal, noting that the New York to Boston corridor, which encompasses his district, has a greater need for high speed rail service “than any other region in country.”

Courtney also commented on a number of national issues. As to whether the Democrats should nominate Obama for President for re-election in 2012, Courtney said simply, “He’s our man.”  However, Courtney faulted the President for not shutting down the American prison in Guantanamo for terrorism suspects. He termed it “a big disappointment” that the President had not kept his campaign promise on this issue. “How long would it have taken U.S. civilian courts to try some 170 cases,” he asked rhetorically.

On the other hand, Courtney said that the Obama Administration was on schedule in pulling U.S. troops out of Iraq. However, he said that the U.S. pull out  in Afghanistan was being extended to 2016, a different date than the one given in the last campaign.

As for the Tea Party movement that was such a significant factor in the 2010 elections, Courtney felt that the party “had overreached,” and that it would be less of a political factor in the future.

As for his own Committee assignments, Courtney, who is now a Minority Member, said that he was “squeezed out” of his spot on the Education Committee. However, he has been named as a Member of the House Agricultural Committee, an assignment which he feels could be relevant to the agricultural areas in his district and other wider issues as well.

Preserve hearing poorly attended, Counsel’s non-attendance an issue

Town Engineer John Jacobson at the maps

Only seventeen members of the public attended the March 2 hearing on whether to permit a private developer to modify the town’s original 2005 plan to develop the Preserve. One hint that the hearing might not be too significant was the fact that the Counsel to the town Planning Commission, Mark Branse, did not attend.
 
In contacting Branse’s office as to why he did not attend the hearing, or even send a back up attorney, Eric Knapp, an attorney at Branse’s firm, said that he himself had been planning to attend the hearing. However, Old Saybrook Town Planner Christine Nelson told him that it was not necessary for him to attend. So, Knapp said, he took the meeting off his calendar.

When questioned, Nelson acknowledged that she had told Knapp that it was not necessary for him to attend the hearing. She also said that she had conferred with Commission Chairman Robert McIntyre, who had said that it was not necessary for an attorney from Branse’s firm to attend the hearing.

Town Planner Christine Nelson (l)and Enviornmental Planner Sandy Prisloe (r)

Nelson also said that on February 25 Attorney Branse had sent a list of outstanding of issues to the Chairman and herself that might be discussed at the March 2 hearing. This February 25 memorandum, evidently, was not sent to the other members of the Commission. It turned out that Branse was vacationing in Florida.
 
Even without its counsel guidance, the Commission did decide that the nine lots of housing sites, contained in the developer’s proposed modifications, were “reasonably likely” to be approved as a conventional land use development. That was it; the Commission decided little else, after close to three hours of deliberations.

Still, the Commission should be credited with undertaking an exhaustive examination of the developer’s proposed, new nine lots from virtually every angle. Discussed were the impact on the vernal pools, roadway accessibility, roadway improvements, flood prevention, adequate septic and water systems, and other impacts on the original general plan for the development of the Preserve.

One member of the Commissioner, Robert D. Missel, however, was restive. He complained that he had not heard from the Commission’s counsel, since a memorandum by Attorney Branse dated January 13. Most especially, Missel said, “We need additional information on the February 16 memorandum of the developer’s counsel.”

Commissioner Robert Missel

In that February 16 memorandum, the developer’s counsel, David Royston, dramatically withdrew from the developer’s original modification proposal the plan to construct over 200 new homes on the site. Missel wanted to take up this overarching issue before going into the details of other land use questions.

Commission Chairman Robert McIntyre tried to sooth the dissident member. McIntyre said that perhaps the dramatic withdrawal of the new houses from the proposed modification should have been the first question considered at the

hearing.  The Chairman went on to assure Commissioner Missel that Attorney Branse would be present at the next Commission hearing. He also told Missel that there were other questions that could the resolved by the Commission without the attendance of counsel.

The Commission concluded the hearing with a discussion of when and where to hold the next meeting. It will be on Tuesday, March 8, in the first floor conference room in the Old Saybrook Town Hall. 

Chairman McIntyre said that the Commission must complete its deliberations by April 22, adding that if possible he would like to schedule committee meetings once a week, so as to make this deadline.

There was one final point that was made a number of times by Chairman McIntyre at the hearing. He said that when the Commission approves a particular element of the developer’s proposed modifications based on a condition, the Commission will rigorously demand that these conditions be met before final approval of the modifications will be granted.

Daily pleased with new commuter rail cars; commuter advocacy group praises state officials

State Senator Daily and the CT Rail Commuter Council, a state commuter advocacy group, both had words of praise for state officials, who have just put into service a brand new rail car on the New Haven line. 

Acknowledging “sometimes frustrating delays,” Senator Daily said, “We look forward to taking delivery of additional new cars soon, with safe and comfortable rides to and from New York.” She added, “The timetable for running M-8 trains for Shore Line East passengers remains uncertain, but my understanding is that an extra measure of patience will be rewarded, when we’re able to ride these new trains at last.”

CT Rail Council Chairman, Jim Cameron

Commuter Council Chairman Jim Cameron, who rode on the first M-8 train in service from Stamford to Grand Central, said, “I personally congratulate the Metro North and Connecticut Department of Transportation officials … They  deserve a lot of credit for their diligence in testing these cars and finally getting them in service.”

Cameron noted that originally it was hoped that the new cars would be in service in 2009, which then slipped into 2010, and now into early 2011. However, he said, “With the first of eight cars having passed their 4,000 error-free miles of testing, the hope is that more trains sets will be added in coming months.” 

According to the commuter group chairman, the builder of the new rail cars, the Japanese firm, Kawasaki, “is supposed to deliver ten new cars per month, and Metro North estimates that 80 cars will be in service by the end of 2011.” “But it will be three years before all 380 of the new cars are delivered,“ he said.

Accounting for the delay in bringing the new cars into service, Senator Daily said that some of it can be “readily explained by the transition from Governor Rell’s administration to Governor Malloy’s.” Also, she cited as reasons for the delay, the “testing of new M-8 rail cars,” and “ironing out problems of new cars on old tracks.”

View more pictures of new car’s first official train ride below (courtesy of  the CT Rail Commuter Council), including a photo of the new bathroom on the train.

Commission members will do the talking at Preserve public hearing March 2

Where Bokum Road ends within the Preserve

There is another hearing coming up on whether the Old Saybrook Planning Commission should approve a modification of its 2005 development plan for the Preserve. This latest hearing will be held at the Old Saybrook Middle School, on Wednesday, March 2 at 7:30 p.m.

However, unlike the previous four hearings, where the general public and interested parties were invited to testify before the Planning Commission, only the members of the Commission will be allowed to speak at the March 2 hearing.  The general public will be permitted to listen to the Commissioners discussing among themselves whether to approve or disapprove the developer’s proposed modification of the Preserve’s original plan, but the time for a public voicing of opinions in these proceedings is over.

Also, unlike the four previous public hearings, during which many of the general public spoke out against the entire development plan approved back in 2005,  Commission members are expected to concentrate entirely on approving or not the modifications proposed by the developer, and not stray to the larger issue.

The Commission has a number of choices in dealing with the modification application of the developer. First it can give its full approval to the modifications proposed by the developer. This would mean that going forward, the original plan would reflect these changes. Second, the Commission could vote to reject the proposed modifications, which would leave the original plan in place, as it has been since 2005.

Also, should the Commission approve the proposed modifications, it even might  go a step further, and treat the adoption of the modifications as in themselves a first phase of a phased development. This in turn could trigger an obligation by the developer, as part of its first phase; to reserve all the open space in the original plan, as is required by the town’s land use regulations. The result would mean that 483 acres of the present site would be reserved in perpetuity as open space.

When it first proposed a modification of the original plan, the heart of the developer’s proposal was to build three stand-alone, housing clusters, which it called pods. However, on the day before the last hearing on February 16, the Attorney for the developer, David Royston, withdrew the request for permission to build the three, stand alone clusters of housing units. Attorney Royston also withdrew the developer’s earlier request for a deferral of roadway improvements in the 2005 plan.

However, even with these changes, the developer’s attorney left in place a request for a modification of the Bokum Road parcel so that it could contain 9 lots, as well as a request to install 30,000 gallon cisterns in each developed area for fire protection.

The Valley Railroad track within the Preserve

Also, Royston said the developer would assume responsibility for gaining approval for a crossing over the Valley Railroad State Park, even in the face of a written denial by the Department of Environmental Protection of such a crossing. The reason for taking this step, the developer’s attorney said, was because of ongoing discussions regarding the purchase of new property that will make the DEP denial of a park crossing a moot point.

It might be noted that Royston made no mention of gaining approvals by the Town of Westbrook, which the developer must obtain before it can construct a key access road to the project. Past and present First Selectmen of Westbrook have expressed their firm opposition to the entire Preserve project, and it is the developer’s full responsibility and not that of the Commission’s, to turn this attitude around in Westbrook, if indeed it can.

Finally, the developer’s Attorney Royston emphasized in his final memorandum to the Commission that the developer was not pursing a “phased development” by making its modification application. However, it could be argued that the Commission itself has the final say as to whether to characterize modifications requested by a developer as the first phase of a phased development, and not the developer.

In this case saying that the requested modifications do not constitute a first phase of a phased development does not necessarily make it so. Under this scenario the Commission would decide the question, if it chooses to consider it.

However, if the proposed changes in the developer’s modification application were indeed determined to be the first phase in a phased development, the developer might even decide to withdraw its entire modification application. If this were to happen, the original 2005 plan would remain intact, and the developer’s plans for the future would become an open question.

Another possible scenario is this. If the developer maintains that its proposed modifications are not the first phase of a phased development, a position with which the Commission disagrees, then the Commission could simply refuse to grant the developer’s application. Then, once again, it would be back to square one in the development of the Preserve.

State introduces first new rail car on the New Haven line; Sen. Daily hails new commuter rail funding

Exterior of new M-8 commuter rail car

The first of the long awaited new rail cars for Connecticut commuters has been put into service on the New Haven line on March 1, according to the state Department of Transportation. The new rail cars are called the “M-8”s.

In announcing this development, DOT spokesman Kevin Nursick said, “We are purchasing a total of 380 new M-8’s and they will be coming in all the way through 2013.” He added, “Some of the M-8’s will be used on the Shore Line East, but that won’t be until later in the game.” 

In a related development State Senator Eileen Daily praised the state Bond Commission’s recent approval of new funding for the “imminent delivery of new rail cars to improve service for Metro North and Shore Line East passengers.” She also has hailed “approved funding for a new rail maintenance facility in New Haven to ensure that the state protects its investment in these new cars.”

Senator Daily also said that the new bond allocations would provide funds for “the next step toward an overhaul of the Shore Line East station in Westbrook, which has already included property transfers and a lot of improvements.” She also said, “Shore Line East stations in Branford, Guilford and Old Saybrook will also be upgraded as a function of this bond allocation.”

The Senator added that “literally thousands of construction and related jobs are expected to be retained or created as a result of these transportation investments.”

Interior of the new M-8 commuter rail car.

Counsel of Old Saybrook Planning Commission suggests new rules for orderly public hearings

Attorney Mark Branse, Counsel to the Old Saybrook Planning Commission and author of article on conducting public hearings

Mark Branse, the attorney for the Old Saybrook Planning Commission, has written an article in an environmental group’s newsletter, suggesting proper rules of conduct for commissioners and the general public at hearings on controversial subjects. 

Attorney Branse must have had his own proposals in mind, when at the Planning Commission’s February 16 public hearing on the Preserve, he threatened to call the police, when he felt that members of the audience were getting out of hand.

Branse’s thoughtful article, entitled “Order in the Court,” was published in “The Habitat” of the Connecticut Association of Conservation and Inland Waterland Commissions.

Although Branse begins by citing a couple of court cases, one when a hearing officers used “foul language and threats” against an applicant, and another when an “atmosphere of hostility” was created, when an issue was made of the applicant’s ethnicity, his article is far from a dull recitation of zoning court cases.

Rather it is an easy to read summary of suggested rules that should be followed at town public hearings. 

Listed under “Be Prepared,” he gives the following advice to hearing chairmen.

  • If you suspect trouble, have police on hand, preferably in uniform. Have more than one if any doubt at all and more on call.
  • Have a large room – oversized in fact. Packing people together contributes to their anonymity and encourages heckling and shouting out (the “voice from the crowd.”) Have a board or other way to display plans, etc. It avoids having people call out, “I can’t see that.”
  • Have an AV (audio visual) system. People will sit in the back row and shout, “I can’t hear.” Invite persons with hearing problems to sit in front of the room (they won’t.)
  • Set out the rules of the game before the applicant ever stands up: “We will hear from the applicant; then questions from the Commission and staff; then those in favor; then those opposed; then those who don’t wish to be categorized as in favor or opposed. There will be no shouting, applause, booing, heckling, or other disturbance. Those who break these rules will be ejected from the meeting. There will be no exceptions.
  • Explain what kind of preceding this is (wetlands, zoning, etc,) and what the criteria for review are. Have copies of those criteria available for distribution and ask people to address their comments to those criteria. . ….  And stick with it.

Under “Keep the lid on,” Branse writes, “Nothing spirals out of control faster than a mob mentality. You must react swiftly and decisively to the very first person who gets out of order.  Shout them down at once and explain that the next person who interrupts the proceeding will be ejected.”

He also writes, “Chairmen: Keep Your Own Troops in Line. Your own colleagues may be your worst enemy, if they are playing to the crowd, are bigoted people, or are just plain stupid. You have to keep them in line, too. If you don’t think you can handle your role, have your town attorney present to do it for you. The town attorney doesn’t have to run for office and (usually) doesn’t live in your town. Let him/her be the lightning rod for misdirected energy. We’re used to having people mad at us! We can handle it.”

Obviously, Branse himself had his own rules in mind when he took over the mike from the Planning Commission Chairman Robert McIntyre and threatened to call the police at the February 16 public hearing on the Preserve in Old Saybrook.

Read the full text of Branse’s thoughtful article in the Winter 2010 newsletter of the Connecticut Association of Conservation and Inland Wetlands Commissions, Vol. 22, No. 4.  Branse’s article can be found on page 6.

Miller narrowly defeats Peckinpaugh in race for State House seat

It was not supposed to be that way. In the overwhelming Democratic 36th State House district, Democrat Phil Miller was forecast to win in a walk over Republican Janet Peckinpaugh. Instead the final unofficial totals were 2,751 votes for Miller to 2,526 for Peckingpaugh, in percentages 52% to 48%.

 With just a shift of just a hundred votes, from Miller to Peckinpaugh, the Republican could have won.  One of the biggest surprises of the vote was that Peckinpaugh carried the traditionally Democrat town of Haddam by close to 200 votes. If Miller had not carried his home town of Essex by over two hundred votes,  the Democrats would have  suffered a surprising defeat.

Miller thanks his winning campaign manager, Lon Seidman of Essex

By towns, the unofficial tallies were: 

   Essex 1,100 to 909 for Miller
   Deep River 509 to 463 for Miller
   Chester 484 to 299 for Miller
   Haddam 658 to 855 for Peckinpaugh.

 In victory Miller acknowledged that the race was “pretty close.” He also credited his opponent, Peckinpaugh, with running a “spirited race.”  As to why his victory had been so narrow, he admitted that Governor Dan Malloy’s recent announcement of new state taxes may have helped Peckinpaugh. Peckinpaugh based her campaign on “no new taxes.”

 As for his future work in Hartford, Miller said, “We are going to have to under promise and over deliver.” Also, Miller reiterated that he is going to keep his position as First Selectman of Essex, until his term is up in November. After that he said he would be looking for a part time job, as do most legislators, to augment his modest income as a state representative.

after here concession speech at Griswold Inn

For her part Peckinpaugh was close to tears, when she addressed supporters at the Griswold Inn after the returns were in. “The reason that I am so emotional,” she said, “is that all of you worked so hard.” “We won Haddam,” she said, “but lost because of a big turnout in Essex.  ”She concluded, “I was so ready to go to Hartford. Thank you so much. It was so close.”

Miller Wins in Close Race in 36th House District Seat

Democrat Phill Miller ran against Republican Janet Peckinpaugh were competing for the seat left open when Democratic State Rep. James Spallone became deputy secretary of the state.

Unofficial results of the special election to fill the vacant 36th House District seat indicate that Phil Miller beat Janet Peckinpaugh in a closely fought race by 2,751 votes to 2,526.

Polls were open today from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. in the towns of Chester, Deep River, Essex, and Haddam for the special election to fill the vacant 36th House District seat. Democrat Phill Miller and Republican Janet Peckinpaugh were competing for the seat left open when Democratic State Rep. James Spallone became deputy secretary of the state. Today’s winner will serve the unexpired term ending in 2012.

Individual town results were as follows:

  • Essex:   Miller 1,100, Peckinpaugh 909
  • Chester: Miller 484, Peckinpaugh 299
  • Deep River: Miller 509, Peckinpaugh 463
  • Haddam:  Miller 658, Peckinpaugh 855

“It was pretty close” Miller told ValleyNewsNow, adding, ”I congratulate Janet on running a spirited race.”  Miller noted that Peckinpaugh based her campaign on a platform that opposed any rise in state taxes – a topic that was clearly causing widspread feelings of frustration.

“We don’t want the Preserve!” A message loud and clear at Old Saybrook’s Feb. 16 public hearing

Finally, the public got a chance to speak!

Up until last evening (Feb. 16), the “public” hearings in Old Saybrook on proposed changes in the much delayed Preserve development, consisted mostly of mind- numbing presentations by droning attorneys and assorted experts. 

Chairman of the Old Saybrook Planning Commission, Robert McIntyre

Not so last evening, when finally Robert McIntyre, Chairman of the Old Saybrook Planning Commission, let the voices of the public to be heard. The overarching question behind it all was whether 1,000 acres of open space in Old Saybrook should be blasted and bulldozed into modernity by a private developer?

Although the narrower question at the hearing was whether the Planning Commission’s original development plan should be modified to permit the building of three clusters of new housing along the edges of the site, speaker after speaker came back to the basic unworthiness of the whole development.  

Without exception every member of the public who spoke, said that letting a private developer build on this unique space of open land should not be allowed.  Although at one point Chairman McIntyre tried to steer the discussion back to the narrower question of whether to permit the building of the three new housing clusters, his words were in vain.

The speakers were of one voice. You could almost hear in the background, “Stop the Preserve! Stop it! Stop it! Stop it!”

One of the arguments expressed was how will a new cluster of houses be sold in the present tight housing market? Also, one speaker claimed that developing the Preserve will mean “huge costs to taxpayers,” such as paying for road upgrades, new intersections and new public services, generally, for the new residents on the site. 

Another speaker pointed out that three private companies had tried to develop the Preserve site, and each of them filed for bankruptcy, the most recent being Lehman Brothers.  

Then, the citizen environmentalists took the floor. Their comments included that the present open space is a coastal forest that is a key transit stop for migrating bird life, and that the vernal pools on the site must be protected, as well as the wood frogs, which after their eggs are hatched, clean the vernal pools. 

At this point Chairman McIntyre tried to get the speakers back on a narrower point. The Commission had approved an overall plan back in 2005, he said. Now under consideration was simply a request by the developer to modify the original plan, so as to build three clusters of new housing.

But no one paid any attention. The ad hominem attacks against the entire Preserve project went on.

One speaker, David J. Walden, told the sad tale about what happened in Fairfield, when residents tried to preserve as open space, a 200 acre tract of land. It was nibbled continually around the edges by developers, he said, until there was nothing left. 

Another speaker said that the issue should be, not what is good for the all mighty dollar, but what is good for the town.

At one point the cheers for the speakers attacking the Preserve development grew too loud for the taste of Mark Branse, Counsel to the Planning Commission. He stood up, seized the mike, and said that he was going to call the police, if the audience did not quiet down.  It seemed to be an overreaction to what was generally a peaceful meeting, but it did quiet the proceedings.

The popular feeling of the audience was summed up by the next speaker who said that after twelve years of considering whether to develop the Preserve, “Enough is enough.”

Finally, near the end of the public venting of hostility to developing the 1,000 acres of open space, the largest open space between Boston and New York City one speaker pointed out, there came a comment that was clearly relevant to the larger question, which was whether the Commission should permit this entire development to go forward.

Attorney Janet P. Brooks, representing the Alliance for Sound Planning, made the point that there was a fatal flaw in the Commission’s ongoing approval of its original plan for the site. The Commission’s original plan, Attorney Brooks pointed out, was conditioned on the fact that the developer would be granted an easement to build a bridge over the Valley Railroad State Park, which is owned by the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection.

Back when it granted its approval of the Preserve development in 2005, the Planning Commission held that it was “probable” that the DEP would grant such an easement.  However, in 2006 the DEP did just the opposite. It flatly denied the developer’s request for a bridge easement. As Attorney Brooks put it in her written submission, “the probability that the DEP would grant an easement for access … no longer exists.”

Planning Commission Counsel Branse termed Attorney Brooks’ argument “an interesting perspective.” However, it could well be more than that, if access to Bokum Road by a bridge is considered to be an integral part of the original plan approved by the Commission. 

What was accepted as probable in 2005, as Brooks pointed out, in 2006 turned out not to be the case.  The access scenario on Bokum Road, a key element in the entire development plan, was no longer possible. This being the case, the Commission might have to go back to the drawing board, because a major assumption in the 2005 plan is not longer valid.

How can the Commission even think of approving the modification of a plan that is itself fundamentally flawed and unworkable is the question?

The effectuation of the Commission’s original plan in 2005 was also premised on the fact that the Town of Westbrook would approve a new entrance to the site on Route 153. However, the Commission has chosen to ignore the fact that the First Selectman of Westbrook have been on record as opposing this entrance to the site for over a decade.

It is almost an “Alice in Wonderland” attitude by the Commission to assume that Westbrook will grant the approvals necessary to implement this aspect of its 2005 plan.  

The public hearings phase on the modification of the original plan for the Preserve is now over, and future meetings will be open to the public but closed to further public comment. The Commission in its deliberations has three options. It can: 1) approve the modification requested by the developer, 2) reject the developer’s proposed modification but leave untouched the original plan, or 3) nullify or amend the original plan, because of the probabilities on which it was based back in 2005 have proved to be simply wrong in 2011.

Planning Commission Public Hearing on Preserve Modification Feb 16

Chairman of the Old Saybrook Planning Commission, Robert McIntyre

Robert McIntyre, Chairman of the Old Saybrook Planning Commission, has scheduled what he terms “the final public hearing” on whether the Commission should approve a modification of its approved plans for the Preserve.  The hearing on this question will be held on Wednesday, February 16, at 7:30 p.m. at the Middle School in Old Saybrook.

The highlight of the developer’s modification application is a proposal to build 230 new housing units in three separate clusters located on the edges of the 1,000 acre Preserve property. In addition to the housing units themselves, the modification application contains detailed plans for new access roads, new sewerage treatment facilities and new landscaping at the building sites.  

If approved by the Planning Commission, the developer would be permitted to modify in a limited way the Preserve’s development plan, which was approved by the Commission over a decade ago.

Of course, all efforts to develop the Preserve were stopped, when in 2005 the Old Saybrook Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission decided that “the proposed 18-hole golf course [in the developer’s plan] is located in or in proximity to the dense wetlands area of the site.”

Rather than to address this ruling and change its plans accordingly, the developer  appealed the Wetlands Commission’s ruling in the courts, and the case went all the way up to the Connecticut Supreme Court. Ultimately, the developer lost all its appeals, and in 2010 embarked on yet another attempt to develop the property.

The developer’s application to the Planning Commission for permission to build the three housing clusters, which they prefer to call pods, is the first attempt to develop any portion of the Preserve, since its final defeat in the courts over the Wetlands decision. As to whether the Planning Commission will approve this new modification proposed by the developer is very much an open question.

One factor that is troubling for the success of the modification application is that even at this late date, two days before the final hearing, the developer was still submitting modifications to its application. 

Mark Branse, Counsel to the Planning Commission, has been sharply critical of some of the developer’s earlier submissions, saying that in some cases they showed “drainage areas that went uphill, and new roads that went nowhere.”

However, even if the developer makes last minute changes in its application that are satisfactory to the Planning Commission, there remains the open question as to whether the developer is prepared to obey the Old Saybrook town regulation that provides that in cases where a developer seeks to develop its property in “phases,” it must include in the first phase all of the property preserved as open space in the overall plan. 

The town’s land use regulations are clear. If an approved development is to be constructed in phases, which the initial three clusters of housing appear to be, then an integral part of the first phase must be a setting aside all of the open space designated in the overall plan.

This would mean that to build the three housing clusters, at the same time the developer must dedicate 483 acres of open space to be preserved forever on the Preserve site. 

To date there has not even been an inkling that the developer is prepared even to contemplate such a proposition.

The meaning of “phased development,” a key issue at February 2 hearing on the Preserve’s new “pods”

At first, it seemed to all come down to a question of semantics. Should the Preserve’s proposed three clusters of housing, called “pods,” be characterized as the first phase of the phased development of the 1,000 acre property? Or, should the pods be considered simply as “stand alone” developments?

However, what is at stake is not simple semantics. Rather it is a question of whether, to get permission to build three pods of housing, the Preserve is prepared to reserve close to 500 acres of its property in perpetuity as open space.

The developer’s counsel, David M. Royston

Throughout much of the drawn out Preserve proceeding before the Old Saybrook Planning Commission, the developer’s counsel, David M. Royston, has staunchly maintained that the three pods for 221 new homes in the original plan, and now 230 in the new one, are a “stand alone” development.

This characterization, the counsel of the Planning Commission, Mark J. Branse, strongly disputed. Far from being a “stand alone” development, Branse maintained that the three proposed pods were clearly the first phase of a phased development of the Preserve’s property.

This dispute even reached the point where Branse in exasperation wrote Robert McIntyre, Chairman of the Planning Commission, on January 13 saying, “Allowing the stand alone development of each of the three pods is allowing a phased development and no amount of linguistic acrobatics can change that fact.”

Then, suddenly, in a memorandum to the Planning Commission on January 19, the Preserve’s Royston appeared to concede the point, that the three pods could indeed be characterized as the first phase of the full development of the Preserve.

Royston said, “The Applicant will proceed … without further debating the interpretation of “phasing” and with the balance of the expectation that the Commission will concur with the interpretation of its staff and its attorney.”

Commission counsel Branse finds this frankly tortured English “unclear,” he said in a recent interview, and he said that he would try to clarify what was being said at the upcoming public hearing on February 2. That hearing will be held, incidentally, at the Middle School in Old Saybrook beginning at 7:30 p.m.

What is at stake here is a huge question for the Preserve. Will the developer even want to go forward with the pods, if their approval, as part of a first phase of the site’s full development, requires reserving as open space 483.3 acres of its property in perpetuity?

Old Saybrook land use regulations clearly require that when a property is developed in phases that included in the first phase there must be the reservation of the entire amount of the open space that was approved in the original development plan.

The pertinent town regulation reads, “56.6.8 Phases. The area covered by an open space subdivision plan may be submitted for final approval in phases, if any land to be reserved for open spaces is so reserved in the first phase.”   

In interpreting this section the Land Use Department of the Town of Old Saybrook wrote to Planning Chairman McIntyre on January 14, “We reiterate that a consequence of phasing development is that the land reserved for open space by the Preliminary Open Space Plan must be dedicated, as to whether in fee or in easement, as a condition of approval at the time of approval of the first phase of the Open Space Plan for Subdivision of Land.”

In his remarks before the Planning Commission on December 1, 2010, Robert A. Levine, President of a prominent real estate development firm based in New York City, and the owner’s representative of the Preserve, made no reference to the town’s land use regulation that applies in the case of a phased development.

Levine did, however, note in his testimony, “that the purpose and intent of this application is to maintain all potential options with respect to the central forest core, from full development, to no development.” He also said, “We are prepared to make such plan revisions as are necessary to meet the regulations.”

As yet there is no clear expression by the owner’s representative of recognizing that concomitant with the Planning Commission’s approval of the first phase of the phased development of the three pods is a requirement to reserve almost half of the Preserve’s present property as open space forever.

Atlantic Seafood Market, Old Saybrook’s new landmark fish store

Atlantic Seafood, 1400 Boston Post Road, Old Saybrook

Whoever heard of a seafood store having a fulltime chef on staff? Well Atlantic Seafood Market, located at 1400 Boston Post Road in Old Saybrook, has one. His name is Jerry Doran, and he is not only a graduate of the prestigious Culinary Institute of America, he was once the head chef of the Four Seasons restaurant in Boston.

Owner Lisa Feinman with Chef Jerry Doran

Atlantic Seafood Owner Lisa Feinman says, “Having a trained chef on staff is a huge benefit. He has a critical eye on everything we sell in the store.”

Another unique thing about the Atlantic Seafood is that Feinman does not think it pays to advertise. “I do not believe in advertising,” she says. “What’s important is when someone says that we have a good product, and then this word of mouth will slowly and effectively grow the business.”

Feinman, who presently lives in Westbrook, purchased the Atlantic Seafood store as an existing business back in March 2005. Since then she has not only expanded the square footage of the store, but brought the store’s reputation to the point where for the last three years in a row, it has been recognized as the best seafood store along the shoreline by the weekly Shoreline Times newspaper. The store was also voted this year, “Business of the Year” by the Old Saybrook Chamber of Commerce.

Currently, the staff of Atlantic Seafood consists of nine to ten persons, a number of them part time. One of the part timers serving seafood customers is Bob Chase, a licensed Connecticut attorney. Chase says that he “loves working with the product, the fish.” He says he “grew up in Newport and learned about fish from his father.” Chase praises the store as having “a very pleasant working environment.” Also, he maintains a legal practice, while not behind the fish counter.

A seafood delight!

Owner Feinman claims two principal distinctions of her store, “We have a really fresh product, and we are nuts about having no preservatives with our fish.” Another attribute that she touts, “All of our dressings are made from scratch.”
When asked what kind of fish customers prefer throughout the year, Feinman (everyone calls her “Lisa”) ticks off a four-season review. In winter she says the store’s freshly made, hot soups are popular, as is salmon, which is always a favorite. In summer she says that boiled lobsters, steamed clams, swordfish and scallops, as well as other seafood that can be cooked on the grill, are favorites.

Spring she says “is a big seafood time of year.” In fact, in this season Atlantic Seafood hosts a six week course on cooking seafood, conducted by a number of expert chefs. Customers are welcome to take the course, and the tuition fee is nominal. Then in the fall Feinman says, “Since there is no more grilling outdoors, people are more into comfort food. The favorites are baked fish, like cod and haddock.

As for her own experience in running a business, Feinman says that she has always been in retail. Also, she says, self confidently, “I always knew I could run a business.”

To substantiate this, she calls attention to an article about the store, published in a July 2007 issue of the New York Times. The Times wrote about the store, “To have fish any fresher, you would have to catch it yourself.”
Speaking of the freshness of the fish sold at Atlantic Seafood, the Lisa says, “We buy off the boats, and we know the boats we buy from. We also have drivers that pick up our fish in Rhode Island and New Bedford, Massachusetts, and everything is shipped overnight.”

Then, she repeats what could well be the store’s mantra, “We do not ever put our fish in preservatives.”

Youth adult program to make “candy sushi” at library in Old Saybrook

Candy sushi

Young adults, 12 years and older, will be invited to “make candy sushi” at the Acton Public Library at 60 Boston Post Road in Old Saybrook on Tuesday, December 28, at 2:00 p.m.  In a program lead by Young Adult Librarian Wendy Connal participants will invited to create a new kind of sushi made out of crisped rice squares, fruit leather, gummy worms and Swedish fish.

Young Adult Librarian Wendy Connal

Ms. Connal was unavailable for comment as to whether “fruit leather” was akin to shoe leather or whether “gummy worms” slithered. She did note, however, that the “looks-like” sushi rolls are sweet to the taste and decidedly not fishy.

Registration for the program is requested by calling the Acton library at 860-395-3184. Ingredients will be provided by the library.